Systemic Inflammation after Transradial Coronary Angiogram: Statistically (But Not Clinically) Significant?

Mariama Akodad, F. Hammer, S. Aguilhon, J. Cristol, F. Leclercq, J. Macia, R. Gervasoni, B. Lattuca, A. Dupuy, F. Roubille
{"title":"Systemic Inflammation after Transradial Coronary Angiogram: Statistically (But Not Clinically) Significant?","authors":"Mariama Akodad, F. Hammer, S. Aguilhon, J. Cristol, F. Leclercq, J. Macia, R. Gervasoni, B. Lattuca, A. Dupuy, F. Roubille","doi":"10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2015.03.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To evaluate if transradial diagnostic coronary angiogram by itself could lead to a systemic inflammation. Methods: In 96 patients with baseline hs-CRP level <5 mg/L, venous samples were obtained the day before the procedure and the day after. Coronary angiogram was performed with 4, 5 or 6 French radial access catheters. Results: Mean hs-CRP at admission was 2.3 mg/L ± 1.4. At day 2, the mean CRP level was 2.7 mg/L±1.9, with a 0.4 mg/L (17%) statistically significant elevation, p<0.0001. No radial access complication (thrombosis or hematoma) occurred. The variation of hs-CRP was positively correlated with age (r=0.20; p=0.04), elevation of creatin kinase (r=0.20; p=0.03) and negatively with amount of contrast (r=0.20; p=0.03). Conclusion: In patients with diagnostic coronary angiogram performed through radial access, there is a statistically significant elevation of the biological inflammatory response, whose clinical significance remains elusive.","PeriodicalId":92802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","volume":"53 1","pages":"495-499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2015.03.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate if transradial diagnostic coronary angiogram by itself could lead to a systemic inflammation. Methods: In 96 patients with baseline hs-CRP level <5 mg/L, venous samples were obtained the day before the procedure and the day after. Coronary angiogram was performed with 4, 5 or 6 French radial access catheters. Results: Mean hs-CRP at admission was 2.3 mg/L ± 1.4. At day 2, the mean CRP level was 2.7 mg/L±1.9, with a 0.4 mg/L (17%) statistically significant elevation, p<0.0001. No radial access complication (thrombosis or hematoma) occurred. The variation of hs-CRP was positively correlated with age (r=0.20; p=0.04), elevation of creatin kinase (r=0.20; p=0.03) and negatively with amount of contrast (r=0.20; p=0.03). Conclusion: In patients with diagnostic coronary angiogram performed through radial access, there is a statistically significant elevation of the biological inflammatory response, whose clinical significance remains elusive.
经桡动脉冠状动脉造影后全身性炎症:有统计学意义(但无临床意义)?
目的:评价经桡动脉诊断性冠状动脉造影本身是否可导致全身性炎症。方法:96例基线hs-CRP水平<5 mg/L的患者,分别于术前、术后1天采集静脉标本。冠状动脉造影采用4、5或6根法国桡动脉导管。结果:入院时hs-CRP平均值为2.3 mg/L±1.4。第2天,CRP平均水平为2.7 mg/L±1.9,其中0.4 mg/L(17%)升高,p<0.0001。无桡骨通路并发症(血栓或血肿)发生。hs-CRP的变化与年龄呈正相关(r=0.20;P =0.04),生成激酶升高(r=0.20;P =0.03),与造影剂量呈正相关(r=0.20;p = 0.03)。结论:经桡动脉入路行诊断性冠状动脉造影的患者,其生物炎症反应升高具有统计学意义,其临床意义尚不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信