Critical Analysis of the Elimination of Pancasila Education in Government Policy Number 57 of 2021 concerning National Education Standards

Suwaibatul Aslamiyah, Purwanto Purwanto, Siti Nur Choiriyah, Ida Royani
{"title":"Critical Analysis of the Elimination of Pancasila Education in Government Policy Number 57 of 2021 concerning National Education Standards","authors":"Suwaibatul Aslamiyah, Purwanto Purwanto, Siti Nur Choiriyah, Ida Royani","doi":"10.29240/jsmp.v6i1.4664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All elements of life in the unitary state will not be separated from the national legal system, in the theory of legislation it is known as the statutory hierarchy, this contains the content that all the rules under it are used as implementing rules for the rules above and there are no conflicting rules between the two. Recently, the public was surprised by the government's policy through Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 regarding the elimination of Pancasila and Indonesian language education as compulsory curriculum content. Whereas government regulations are used as derivatives of the law on the national education system and the law on higher education. The research method used is the use of normative juridical critical analysis methods and viewed from various points of view in giving disapproval of government policies through Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 precisely in Article 40 Paragraphs 2 and 3. The results of this study are to present 3 basic reasons why it is necessary to include Pancasila in the Government Regulation, namely First, the need to consider the previous regulations, second, the need for the formulation of this policy through an open political process, third, the need to review it from the point of view of Education Reformulation, both philosophically and ideologically. Thus, it is very necessary to review this legal product so that it is relevant to the law as the parent law.","PeriodicalId":33185,"journal":{"name":"Tadbir Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tadbir Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v6i1.4664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All elements of life in the unitary state will not be separated from the national legal system, in the theory of legislation it is known as the statutory hierarchy, this contains the content that all the rules under it are used as implementing rules for the rules above and there are no conflicting rules between the two. Recently, the public was surprised by the government's policy through Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 regarding the elimination of Pancasila and Indonesian language education as compulsory curriculum content. Whereas government regulations are used as derivatives of the law on the national education system and the law on higher education. The research method used is the use of normative juridical critical analysis methods and viewed from various points of view in giving disapproval of government policies through Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 precisely in Article 40 Paragraphs 2 and 3. The results of this study are to present 3 basic reasons why it is necessary to include Pancasila in the Government Regulation, namely First, the need to consider the previous regulations, second, the need for the formulation of this policy through an open political process, third, the need to review it from the point of view of Education Reformulation, both philosophically and ideologically. Thus, it is very necessary to review this legal product so that it is relevant to the law as the parent law.
关于国家教育标准的2021年第57号政府政策中取消潘卡西拉教育的批判性分析
统一国家的一切生活要素都不会脱离国家法律体系,在立法理论中它被称为法定层级,它所包含的内容是,在它之下的所有规则都是上面的规则的实施规则,两者之间没有冲突的规则。最近,公众对政府的政策感到惊讶,通过2021年第57号政府法规,取消潘卡西拉和印度尼西亚语教育作为必修课程内容。而政府法规则被用作国家教育法和高等教育法的衍生品。所使用的研究方法是使用规范的司法批判性分析方法,并从不同的角度来看,通过2021年第57号政府法规,即第40条第2段和第3段,对政府政策表示反对。本研究的结果提出有必要将潘卡西拉纳入政府法规的3个基本原因,即:第一,需要考虑以前的法规;第二,需要通过开放的政治过程制定这项政策;第三,需要从教育改革的角度对其进行哲学和意识形态上的审查。因此,非常有必要对这一法律产品进行审查,使其作为母体法与法律相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信