Why Lynn Stout Took Up the Sword Against Share Value Maximization

Pub Date : 2020-11-13 DOI:10.1515/ael-2020-0083

Margaret M. Blair

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Corporate Issue: A Tribute to Lynn Stout 1. Why Lynn Stout Took Up the Sword Against Share Value Maximization, by Margaret Blair, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0083. 2. Beating Shareholder Activism at Its Own Game, by Margaret Blair, https://doi.org/10.1515/ ael-2019-0040. 3. Ownership (Lost) and Corporate Control: An Enterprise Entity Perspective, by Yuri Biondi, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0025. 4. The Shareholder Value Mess, by Jean-Philippe Robé, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0039. 5. Executive Pay and Labor’s Shares: Unions and Corporate Governance from Enron to DoddFrank, by Sanford M. Jacoby, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0073. 6. How America’s Corporations Lost Their Public Purpose, and How it Might be (Partially) Restored, by David Ciepley, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0088. 7. The Contest on Corporate Purpose:Why Lynn Stout was Right andMilton FriedmanwasWrong, by Thomas Clarke, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0145. 8. Lynn Stout, Pro-sociality, and the Campaign for Corporate Enlightenment, by Donald Langevoort, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0067.

查看原文

林恩·斯托特为何反对股票价值最大化

企业问题:致敬林恩·斯托特为什么林恩·斯托特拿起了反对股票价值最大化的剑，玛格丽特·布莱尔著，https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0083。2. 在自己的游戏中击败股东激进主义，作者玛格丽特·布莱尔，https://doi.org/10.1515/ ael-2019-0040。3.所有权(丢失)和公司控制:一个企业实体视角，作者Yuri Biondi, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0025。4. 《股东价值混乱》，作者Jean-Philippe rob， https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0039。5. 高管薪酬与劳工股份:从安然到多德-弗兰克的工会与公司治理，作者:桑福德·m·雅各比，https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0073。6. 《美国公司如何失去公共目标，以及如何(部分)恢复》，作者:David Ciepley, https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0088。7. 《企业目的之争:为什么林恩·斯托特是对的，米尔顿·弗里德曼是错的》，托马斯·克拉克著，https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0145。8. 林恩·斯托特，《亲社会性与企业启蒙运动》，唐纳德·朗格沃特著，https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0067。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文