Prospects for Localizing Co-management

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu, Francisco Cuogo
{"title":"Prospects for Localizing Co-management","authors":"Ayonghe Akonwi Nebasifu, Francisco Cuogo","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2021.2005655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the institutionalization of biodiversity conservation in the 1980s, co-management has been employed as an economic policy for regulating the joint use of natural resources. However, barriers to its effectiveness may at times arise, as when imported initiatives are poorly acculturated to local needs. Inspired by contributions on the commons, globalization, and critical policy studies, we examine lapses in co-management and related natural resource governance practices, using a systematic review of policy publications on nature-reliant communities in the global South and North. The conclusions propose options through which a “localized co-management” may help enhance the inclusion of local/indigenous people in making decisions concerning the use of natural resources. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 17 November 2020 Revised 26 February 2021 Accepted 26 April 2021","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2021.2005655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the institutionalization of biodiversity conservation in the 1980s, co-management has been employed as an economic policy for regulating the joint use of natural resources. However, barriers to its effectiveness may at times arise, as when imported initiatives are poorly acculturated to local needs. Inspired by contributions on the commons, globalization, and critical policy studies, we examine lapses in co-management and related natural resource governance practices, using a systematic review of policy publications on nature-reliant communities in the global South and North. The conclusions propose options through which a “localized co-management” may help enhance the inclusion of local/indigenous people in making decisions concerning the use of natural resources. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 17 November 2020 Revised 26 February 2021 Accepted 26 April 2021
共同管理的本地化前景
自20世纪80年代生物多样性保护制度化以来,共同管理一直是一种调节自然资源共同利用的经济政策。然而,有时可能会出现阻碍其有效性的障碍,因为当引进的倡议不能很好地适应当地需要时。在公地、全球化和关键政策研究方面的贡献的启发下,我们通过对全球南方和北方依赖自然的社区的政策出版物的系统回顾,研究了共同管理和相关自然资源治理实践中的失误。结论提出了一些备选办法,通过这些办法,“地方化的共同管理”可能有助于使当地/土著人民更多地参与有关自然资源使用的决定。文章历史收到2020年11月17日修改2021年2月26日接受2021年4月26日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信