Opportunities and Outcomes for Postdocs in Canada

H. Ngo, H. Kirk, Toby Brown, Tyrone Woods, G. Eadie, S. Lawler, Locke Spencer
{"title":"Opportunities and Outcomes for Postdocs in Canada","authors":"H. Ngo, H. Kirk, Toby Brown, Tyrone Woods, G. Eadie, S. Lawler, Locke Spencer","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3827799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, postdoctoral fellow (PDF) researchers in Canada face challenges due to the precarious nature of their employment and their overall low compensation and benefits coverage. This report presents three themes, written as statements of need, to support an inclusive and thriving PDF community. These themes are the need for better terms of employment and conditions, the need for access to grants by non-permanent research staff, and the need for a sustainable PDF hiring model that considers the outcomes for the PDFs. \nWe make six recommendations: \nR1. PDFs should be hired and compensated as skilled experts in their areas, not as trainees. \nR2. Standard PDF hiring practices should be revised to be more inclusive of different life circumstances. \n- R2.1 Allow PDFs the option of part-time employment. \n- R2.2 Remove years-since-PhD time limits from PDF jobs. \n- R2.3 Financially support PDF hires for relocation and visa expenses. \nR3. CASCA should form a committee to advocate for and provide support to astronomy PDFs in Canada. \nR4. CASCA should encourage universities to create offices dedicated to their PDFs. \nR5. PDFs and other PhD-holding term researchers with a host institution should be able to compete for and win grants to self-fund their own research. \nR6. Astronomy in Canada should hire general-purpose continuing support scientist positions instead of term PDFs to fill project or mission-specific requirements. \nIn short, we ask for prioritization of people over production of papers.","PeriodicalId":8459,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3827799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, postdoctoral fellow (PDF) researchers in Canada face challenges due to the precarious nature of their employment and their overall low compensation and benefits coverage. This report presents three themes, written as statements of need, to support an inclusive and thriving PDF community. These themes are the need for better terms of employment and conditions, the need for access to grants by non-permanent research staff, and the need for a sustainable PDF hiring model that considers the outcomes for the PDFs. We make six recommendations: R1. PDFs should be hired and compensated as skilled experts in their areas, not as trainees. R2. Standard PDF hiring practices should be revised to be more inclusive of different life circumstances. - R2.1 Allow PDFs the option of part-time employment. - R2.2 Remove years-since-PhD time limits from PDF jobs. - R2.3 Financially support PDF hires for relocation and visa expenses. R3. CASCA should form a committee to advocate for and provide support to astronomy PDFs in Canada. R4. CASCA should encourage universities to create offices dedicated to their PDFs. R5. PDFs and other PhD-holding term researchers with a host institution should be able to compete for and win grants to self-fund their own research. R6. Astronomy in Canada should hire general-purpose continuing support scientist positions instead of term PDFs to fill project or mission-specific requirements. In short, we ask for prioritization of people over production of papers.
加拿大博士后的机会和成果
目前,加拿大博士后研究人员面临着就业不稳定、薪酬福利总体较低的挑战。本报告提出了三个主题,作为需求陈述,以支持一个包容和繁荣的PDF社区。这些主题是需要更好的雇用条款和条件,需要获得非常任研究人员的资助,以及需要一个可持续的PDF雇用模式,考虑PDF的结果。我们提出六条建议:pdf应该作为他们领域的熟练专家而不是实习生来雇佣和补偿。R2。标准的PDF招聘实践应该进行修订,以更包容不同的生活环境。- R2.1容许pdf成为兼职雇员的选择。- R2.2取消PDF作业的毕业年限限制。- R2.3财政支持PDF的搬迁和签证费用。R3。CASCA应该成立一个委员会来倡导和支持加拿大的天文pdf文件。R4。CASCA应该鼓励大学建立专门的pdf文档办公室。R5。pdf和其他持有博士学位的研究人员应该能够竞争并赢得资助,以资助自己的研究。R6。加拿大的天文学应该雇用一般用途的持续支持科学家职位,而不是长期pdf来满足项目或任务的具体要求。简而言之,我们要求优先考虑人而不是文件的生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信