Is the environmental, social and corporate governance score the missing factor in the Fama-French five-factor model?

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Luyanda M.Q. Nsibande, Avani Sebastian
{"title":"Is the environmental, social and corporate governance score the missing factor in the Fama-French five-factor model?","authors":"Luyanda M.Q. Nsibande, Avani Sebastian","doi":"10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"over the course of 2021. This major piece of regulation is aimed at promoting sustainable investment by clarifying the revised and increased roles and duties asset managers and investors now have in relation to the sustainability agenda. Asset pricing theory can be used in the positive and in the normative context. When observing the pricing of assets in the market, a position could be taken to try to understand the actual pricing behaviour of the assets and conclusions be formed around why the pricing of assets behaves in the Background: Companies are increasingly encouraged to focus on the creation of sustainable value. Financial research institutions evaluate companies’ performance based on pre-established indicators relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG). These scores are intended to inform decisions by equity investors, among others. However, traditional asset pricing models do not include ESG scores. Aim: The purpose of this research is to discover whether the inclusion of ESG scores in the Fama-French five-factor model (FF5F) will improve the model’s predicting power. Setting: Financial research institutions aim to improve the information environment in the South African capital markets. Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)-listed firms are also required to produce integrated reports, emphasising responsible investment. Method: For the largest 40 JSE-listed companies, data over the 5-year period from 2015 to 2019 were employed to compare the predicting power of the FF5F model before and after the inclusion of ESG scores. Results: The results showed that the predictive power of the FF5F model is only marginally improved when the ESG scores are incorporated. Conclusion: These findings indicate that equity returns are not significantly influenced by ESG scores. This research provides the basis for further endeavours on the share-price implications of ESG performance. Contribution: This research contributes to the growing strand of literature on responsible investment and the creation of sustainable value. The research also offers a theoretical contribution by connecting literature on asset pricing with work on sustainability.","PeriodicalId":46244,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","volume":"396 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

over the course of 2021. This major piece of regulation is aimed at promoting sustainable investment by clarifying the revised and increased roles and duties asset managers and investors now have in relation to the sustainability agenda. Asset pricing theory can be used in the positive and in the normative context. When observing the pricing of assets in the market, a position could be taken to try to understand the actual pricing behaviour of the assets and conclusions be formed around why the pricing of assets behaves in the Background: Companies are increasingly encouraged to focus on the creation of sustainable value. Financial research institutions evaluate companies’ performance based on pre-established indicators relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG). These scores are intended to inform decisions by equity investors, among others. However, traditional asset pricing models do not include ESG scores. Aim: The purpose of this research is to discover whether the inclusion of ESG scores in the Fama-French five-factor model (FF5F) will improve the model’s predicting power. Setting: Financial research institutions aim to improve the information environment in the South African capital markets. Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)-listed firms are also required to produce integrated reports, emphasising responsible investment. Method: For the largest 40 JSE-listed companies, data over the 5-year period from 2015 to 2019 were employed to compare the predicting power of the FF5F model before and after the inclusion of ESG scores. Results: The results showed that the predictive power of the FF5F model is only marginally improved when the ESG scores are incorporated. Conclusion: These findings indicate that equity returns are not significantly influenced by ESG scores. This research provides the basis for further endeavours on the share-price implications of ESG performance. Contribution: This research contributes to the growing strand of literature on responsible investment and the creation of sustainable value. The research also offers a theoretical contribution by connecting literature on asset pricing with work on sustainability.
在Fama-French五因素模型中,环境、社会和公司治理得分是缺失的因素吗?
在2021年期间。这一重要法规旨在通过澄清资产管理公司和投资者目前在可持续性议程方面修订和增加的角色和职责,促进可持续投资。资产定价理论可以在积极和规范的背景下使用。在观察市场上的资产定价时,可以采取一种立场,试图理解资产的实际定价行为,并围绕资产定价在以下背景下的行为得出结论:越来越多的公司被鼓励专注于创造可持续价值。金融研究机构根据预先建立的与环境、社会和治理(ESG)相关的指标来评估公司的业绩。这些分数旨在为股票投资者和其他投资者的决策提供信息。然而,传统的资产定价模型不包括ESG分数。目的:本研究旨在探讨Fama-French五因素模型(FF5F)中纳入ESG评分是否会提高模型的预测能力。背景:金融研究机构旨在改善南非资本市场的信息环境。约翰内斯堡证券交易所(JSE)的上市公司也被要求提供综合报告,强调负责任的投资。方法:以沪市规模最大的40家上市公司为对象,采用2015 - 2019年5年的数据,比较纳入ESG评分前后FF5F模型的预测能力。结果:结果表明,当纳入ESG评分时,FF5F模型的预测能力仅略有提高。结论:这些发现表明股权收益不受ESG得分的显著影响。本研究为进一步研究ESG绩效对股价的影响提供了基础。贡献:本研究对负责任投资和可持续价值创造的相关文献的发展做出了贡献。该研究还通过将资产定价文献与可持续性研究联系起来,提供了理论贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS) is a leading South African-based publication for interdisciplinary research in the economic and management sciences. The journal publishes and disseminates high-quality academic articles that contribute to the better understanding of the interaction between economic, environmental and social perspectives as applicable to the broader management sciences in an African environment. The editorial board therefore invites authors to submit their research from areas such as economics, finance, accounting, human capital, marketing and other related disciplines that break down common intellectual silos and prepares a new path for debate on the operation and development of sustainable markets and organisations as relevant to the broader African context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信