Gender Differences in Heart Failure Hospitalization Post-Myocardial Infarction

Pradeep Rongali, K. Jain, Srikanth Nakka, Achukatla Kumar
{"title":"Gender Differences in Heart Failure Hospitalization Post-Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Pradeep Rongali, K. Jain, Srikanth Nakka, Achukatla Kumar","doi":"10.25259/mm_ijcdw_471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPatients with post-myocardial infarction (MI) are more likely to die later from heart failure (HF), arrhythmic events, or reinfarction. According to recent studies, mortality rates were noticeably higher in women, than in men. This has been linked to variations in age, comorbidities, symptom presentation, and pathophysiology of the underlying coronary artery disease. There is little information on how these typical gender disparities affect post- MI survival. Studies on individuals with coronary artery disease have primarily focused on men, with women typically being left out of most series. Despite the relatively high prevalence of ischemic heart disease in women, there is a lack of information regarding the clinical course of the condition, its management, and clinical outcomes in this particular population due to the underrepresentation of women in the medical literature in this field. The gender disparities in post-MI patients who present with HF will be briefly discussed in this article.\n\n\n\nA total of 50 patients that presented with HF and had a previous history of MI were included in this study after taking consent. After taking history and detailed physical examination, investigations that were sent were reviewed and the subjects followed up in the hospital stay to look for outcomes. The data are compiled and subjected to statistical analysis.\n\n\n\nIt is observed that among the 50 subjects, 32% of them had recurrent HF (13 of the 30 females and three of the 20 males). p = 0.04 is statistically significant. Among the study subjects, the hospital outcomes observed showed that, out of 50 subjects, 47 subjects recovered and the other three died in hospital stay. All the three deaths are women. p = 0.15 is not statistically significant.\n\n\n\nThis study concludes that women are more likely than males to require hospitalization for recurrent HF following a MI. This study also demonstrates that, despite the higher risk of recurrent HF, women do not have a higher mortality risk than males.\n","PeriodicalId":92905,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/mm_ijcdw_471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Patients with post-myocardial infarction (MI) are more likely to die later from heart failure (HF), arrhythmic events, or reinfarction. According to recent studies, mortality rates were noticeably higher in women, than in men. This has been linked to variations in age, comorbidities, symptom presentation, and pathophysiology of the underlying coronary artery disease. There is little information on how these typical gender disparities affect post- MI survival. Studies on individuals with coronary artery disease have primarily focused on men, with women typically being left out of most series. Despite the relatively high prevalence of ischemic heart disease in women, there is a lack of information regarding the clinical course of the condition, its management, and clinical outcomes in this particular population due to the underrepresentation of women in the medical literature in this field. The gender disparities in post-MI patients who present with HF will be briefly discussed in this article. A total of 50 patients that presented with HF and had a previous history of MI were included in this study after taking consent. After taking history and detailed physical examination, investigations that were sent were reviewed and the subjects followed up in the hospital stay to look for outcomes. The data are compiled and subjected to statistical analysis. It is observed that among the 50 subjects, 32% of them had recurrent HF (13 of the 30 females and three of the 20 males). p = 0.04 is statistically significant. Among the study subjects, the hospital outcomes observed showed that, out of 50 subjects, 47 subjects recovered and the other three died in hospital stay. All the three deaths are women. p = 0.15 is not statistically significant. This study concludes that women are more likely than males to require hospitalization for recurrent HF following a MI. This study also demonstrates that, despite the higher risk of recurrent HF, women do not have a higher mortality risk than males.
心梗后心力衰竭住院的性别差异
心肌梗死后(MI)患者更有可能死于心力衰竭(HF)、心律失常事件或再梗死。根据最近的研究,妇女的死亡率明显高于男子。这与年龄、合并症、症状表现和潜在冠状动脉疾病的病理生理有关。关于这些典型的性别差异如何影响心肌梗死后存活的信息很少。对冠状动脉疾病患者的研究主要集中在男性身上,女性通常被排除在大多数系列之外。尽管女性缺血性心脏病的患病率相对较高,但由于在该领域的医学文献中女性的代表性不足,缺乏有关该疾病的临床病程、管理和临床结果的信息。本文将简要讨论心肌梗死后并发心衰患者的性别差异。总共有50例HF患者和既往心肌梗死病史的患者在同意后被纳入本研究。在记录病史和详细体格检查后,对发送的调查进行回顾,并在住院期间对受试者进行随访以寻找结果。这些数据经过整理和统计分析。我们观察到,50例受试者中有32%的人有复发性HF(30例女性中有13例,20例男性中有3例)。P = 0.04有统计学意义。在研究对象中,观察到的住院结果显示,50名研究对象中,47名患者康复,3名患者在住院期间死亡。三名死者都是女性P = 0.15无统计学意义。本研究得出结论,心肌梗死后复发性心衰女性比男性更有可能需要住院治疗。本研究还表明,尽管复发性心衰的风险更高,但女性的死亡风险并不高于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信