Colliding Norm Clusters: Protection of Civilians, Responsibility to Protect, and Counter-terrorism in Mali

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
A. Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson, Charles T. Hunt
{"title":"Colliding Norm Clusters: Protection of Civilians, Responsibility to Protect, and Counter-terrorism in Mali","authors":"A. Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson, Charles T. Hunt","doi":"10.1163/1875-984x-14010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The United Nations Security Council passes resolutions that invoke multiple norms including the protection of civilians (PoC), the responsibility to protect (R2P), and counter-terrorism. The fact that these norms are invoked alongside one another raises questions about how they interact. While there have been studies on the relationship between PoC and R2P, as well as R2P and counter-terrorism, as far as the authors are aware, this is the first study that analyses the interplay between all three norms. To do this, the article utilises the concept of ‘norm clusters’ to discuss the internal structure of PoC, R2P, and counter-terrorism prior to analysing the linkages between them. The article proposes that PoC, R2P, and counter-terrorism can be viewed as a ‘human protection norm cluster’ but also highlights areas of tension and overlap between the three norms. At the empirical level, the article explores these dynamics in the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (minusma). Although all three norms embody the value of human protection, our findings evidence, first, these norms are not given equal weight, second, they are not mutually reinforcing, and third, even though counter-terrorism plays a more peripheral role, it has a detrimental impact upon PoC.","PeriodicalId":38207,"journal":{"name":"Global Responsibility to Protect","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Responsibility to Protect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-984x-14010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The United Nations Security Council passes resolutions that invoke multiple norms including the protection of civilians (PoC), the responsibility to protect (R2P), and counter-terrorism. The fact that these norms are invoked alongside one another raises questions about how they interact. While there have been studies on the relationship between PoC and R2P, as well as R2P and counter-terrorism, as far as the authors are aware, this is the first study that analyses the interplay between all three norms. To do this, the article utilises the concept of ‘norm clusters’ to discuss the internal structure of PoC, R2P, and counter-terrorism prior to analysing the linkages between them. The article proposes that PoC, R2P, and counter-terrorism can be viewed as a ‘human protection norm cluster’ but also highlights areas of tension and overlap between the three norms. At the empirical level, the article explores these dynamics in the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (minusma). Although all three norms embody the value of human protection, our findings evidence, first, these norms are not given equal weight, second, they are not mutually reinforcing, and third, even though counter-terrorism plays a more peripheral role, it has a detrimental impact upon PoC.
冲突规范簇:马里平民保护、保护责任和反恐
联合国安理会通过的决议援引了包括保护平民(PoC)、保护责任(R2P)和反恐在内的多种准则。这些规范彼此同时被调用的事实引发了关于它们如何相互作用的问题。虽然已经有关于PoC和R2P,以及R2P和反恐之间关系的研究,但据作者所知,这是第一个分析这三种规范之间相互作用的研究。为此,本文在分析PoC、R2P和反恐之间的联系之前,利用“规范集群”的概念来讨论PoC、R2P和反恐的内部结构。文章提出,PoC、R2P和反恐可以被视为“人类保护规范集群”,但也强调了这三种规范之间的紧张和重叠领域。在实证层面,本文探讨了联合国马里多层面综合稳定特派团(minusma)的这些动态。虽然这三种规范都体现了人类保护的价值,但我们的研究结果表明,首先,这些规范的权重不平等,其次,它们不是相互加强的,第三,尽管反恐发挥了更外围的作用,但它对人类保护的影响是有害的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Responsibility to Protect
Global Responsibility to Protect Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
44.40%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信