Effect of replacing wheat-bran with cheka-residue as energy supplement on weight gain, nutrient digestibility and economic efficiency of Woyto-guji goats in Konso, Southern Ethiopia

Getnet Kebede Kalsa, Derrebe Kassa Hibebo, Milkias Fanta Heliso
{"title":"Effect of replacing wheat-bran with cheka-residue as energy supplement on weight gain, nutrient digestibility and economic efficiency of Woyto-guji goats in Konso, Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Getnet Kebede Kalsa, Derrebe Kassa Hibebo, Milkias Fanta Heliso","doi":"10.31248/JASP2020.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment was conducted on former Konso Woreda, now Konso Zone, Baide station. The aim of the study was to determine cheka-residue as an economic source of energy feed to replace wheat bran through evaluating its effect on weight gain and nutrient digestibility. Twenty intact yearling woyto-guji bucks selected from Baide CBBP association were divided in to five treatment groups each having four animal units. They were assigned to five experimental feeds [(Group-1/T1= Grazing + 1.8 L cheka-residue; Group-2/T2= Grazing + 0.6 L cheka-residue + 132 g wheat bran; Group-3/T3= Grazing + 1.2 L cheka-residue + 68 g wheat bran; Group-4/T4= Grazing + 200 g wheat bran; Group-5/T5= Grazing only) in a completely block design. Equal amount of noug-seed-cake (100 g/anl/day) was given to all treatment groups. The study comprised 90 days of feeding + 7 days digestibility trial. Supplementation after grazing tend to have increased (p<0.05) live weight and nutrient digestibility of experimental goats in current study. The average daily gain of goats maintained with T1 and T4 were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those of other treatments. Animals that received T1 and T4 had higher (p<0.05) total dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and crude fiber digestibility than in the remaining dietary treatments with T4 recording the highest value of 80.6% which was 12.81% higher than control. However, the two treatments (T1 and T4) were not different both in weight gain and nutrient digestibility reflecting that one can be used on place of the other. Besides, goats attained slaughter weight in a range of 29.9 to 31.8 kg as compared to 26.8 kg weight recorded for goats managed as control. Cheka-residue supplementation in current experiment provides more profit than others. Hence, it can be concluded that this by-product is a potential feed to replace wheat bran as it is very acceptable.","PeriodicalId":14890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2020.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experiment was conducted on former Konso Woreda, now Konso Zone, Baide station. The aim of the study was to determine cheka-residue as an economic source of energy feed to replace wheat bran through evaluating its effect on weight gain and nutrient digestibility. Twenty intact yearling woyto-guji bucks selected from Baide CBBP association were divided in to five treatment groups each having four animal units. They were assigned to five experimental feeds [(Group-1/T1= Grazing + 1.8 L cheka-residue; Group-2/T2= Grazing + 0.6 L cheka-residue + 132 g wheat bran; Group-3/T3= Grazing + 1.2 L cheka-residue + 68 g wheat bran; Group-4/T4= Grazing + 200 g wheat bran; Group-5/T5= Grazing only) in a completely block design. Equal amount of noug-seed-cake (100 g/anl/day) was given to all treatment groups. The study comprised 90 days of feeding + 7 days digestibility trial. Supplementation after grazing tend to have increased (p<0.05) live weight and nutrient digestibility of experimental goats in current study. The average daily gain of goats maintained with T1 and T4 were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those of other treatments. Animals that received T1 and T4 had higher (p<0.05) total dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and crude fiber digestibility than in the remaining dietary treatments with T4 recording the highest value of 80.6% which was 12.81% higher than control. However, the two treatments (T1 and T4) were not different both in weight gain and nutrient digestibility reflecting that one can be used on place of the other. Besides, goats attained slaughter weight in a range of 29.9 to 31.8 kg as compared to 26.8 kg weight recorded for goats managed as control. Cheka-residue supplementation in current experiment provides more profit than others. Hence, it can be concluded that this by-product is a potential feed to replace wheat bran as it is very acceptable.
以契卡渣替代麦麸作为能量补充对埃塞俄比亚南部Konso Woyto-guji山羊增重、营养物质消化率和经济效益的影响
试验地点为原近索工田,现近索区,白德站。本试验旨在通过评价契卡渣对增重和营养物质消化率的影响,确定其作为替代麦麸的经济能源饲料。选取白德CBBP协会的20只完整的一岁虎托孤脊雄鹿分为5个治疗组,每组4只。各组饲喂5种试验饲料[(1组/T1=放牧+ 1.8 L契卡渣;2组/T2=放牧+ 0.6 L契卡渣+ 132 g麦麸;3组/T3=放牧+ 1.2 L契卡渣+ 68 g麦麸;组4/T4=放牧+ 200 g麦麸;Group-5/T5=放牧)在一个完全块的设计。各处理组均给予等量的种子饼(100 g/ l/d)。试验为90 d饲养+ 7 d消化率试验。放牧后添加饲粮有提高试验山羊活重和营养物质消化率的趋势(p<0.05)。T1和T4维持的山羊平均日增重显著高于其他处理(p<0.05)。T1和T4处理的总干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)、粗蛋白质(CP)和粗纤维消化率均高于其他饲粮处理(p<0.05),其中T4处理最高,为80.6%,比对照组提高12.81%。但两种处理(T1和T4)在增重和营养物质消化率方面均无显著差异,说明两者可以相互替代。此外,山羊的屠宰体重在29.9至31.8公斤之间,而对照组山羊的屠宰体重为26.8公斤。目前试验中添加契卡渣的效益较好。由此可见,该副产物具有良好的可接受性,是替代麦麸的潜在饲料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信