The Afrocentric Project: The Quest for Particularity and the Negation of Objectivity

J. Mcclendon
{"title":"The Afrocentric Project: The Quest for Particularity and the Negation of Objectivity","authors":"J. Mcclendon","doi":"10.1525/EES.1995.18.1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a philosophical critique of a very controversial paradigm within Africana Studies. The methodology employed in this paper is a philosophical critique of the epistemological and ontological underpinnings of Afrocentricity. The quest for a distinctive (metaphysical) Africanist perspective has cast Afrocentricity as a subjectivist approach to affirming the in­ tegrity of an Africana existential condition. While in the course of African American intellectual history a number of scholars and thinkers have supported the notion of an unique Black metaphysics, Afrocentricity brings to the table ap­ proach to the tradition of affirming an African metaphysical exclusivism. What I mean by the quest for particularity is the notion that there is a unique Africana presence in the world, such that it stands antithetical to the EuropeanlWestern ex­ perience. I explore what I call \"weak Afrocentricity,\" i.e., a cul­ tu ral determinism demarcating the African and European ex­ perience. Afrocentricity, in positing a cultural relativism, ren­ der s that not only is Eurocentrism a false universality. but that universality per se is false. This denial of universality (at the ontological level) has as a corresponding category the nega­ tion of objectivity (at the epistemological plane). I examine the works of two leading Afrocentric proponents, Molefi Asante and Marimba Ani, arguably two of the most significant con­ tributors to the philosophical foundations of Afrocentricity.","PeriodicalId":93702,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in ethnic studies : the journal of the National Association of Interdisciplinary Ethnic Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"19-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in ethnic studies : the journal of the National Association of Interdisciplinary Ethnic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/EES.1995.18.1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article is a philosophical critique of a very controversial paradigm within Africana Studies. The methodology employed in this paper is a philosophical critique of the epistemological and ontological underpinnings of Afrocentricity. The quest for a distinctive (metaphysical) Africanist perspective has cast Afrocentricity as a subjectivist approach to affirming the in­ tegrity of an Africana existential condition. While in the course of African American intellectual history a number of scholars and thinkers have supported the notion of an unique Black metaphysics, Afrocentricity brings to the table ap­ proach to the tradition of affirming an African metaphysical exclusivism. What I mean by the quest for particularity is the notion that there is a unique Africana presence in the world, such that it stands antithetical to the EuropeanlWestern ex­ perience. I explore what I call "weak Afrocentricity," i.e., a cul­ tu ral determinism demarcating the African and European ex­ perience. Afrocentricity, in positing a cultural relativism, ren­ der s that not only is Eurocentrism a false universality. but that universality per se is false. This denial of universality (at the ontological level) has as a corresponding category the nega­ tion of objectivity (at the epistemological plane). I examine the works of two leading Afrocentric proponents, Molefi Asante and Marimba Ani, arguably two of the most significant con­ tributors to the philosophical foundations of Afrocentricity.
非洲中心项目:对特殊性的追求和对客观性的否定
这篇文章是对非洲研究中一个非常有争议的范式的哲学批判。本文采用的方法论是对非洲中心主义认识论和本体论基础的哲学批判。对一种独特的(形而上学的)非洲主义观点的追求,使非洲中心主义成为一种主观主义的方法,以肯定非洲存在条件的完整性。虽然在非裔美国人思想史的过程中,许多学者和思想家都支持独特的黑人形而上学的概念,但非洲中心主义带来了一种肯定非洲形而上学排他主义的传统方法。我所说的对特殊性的追求是指这样一种观念,即世界上有一种独特的非洲存在,它与欧洲和西方的经验相对立。我探讨了我所谓的“弱非洲中心”,即区分非洲和欧洲经验的文化决定论。非洲中心主义提出了一种文化相对主义,表明欧洲中心主义不仅是一种虚假的普遍性。但这种普遍性本身是错误的。这种对普遍性的否定(在本体论层面上)与对客观性的否定(在认识论层面上)是相对应的范畴。我研究了两位主要的非洲中心主义支持者的作品,莫莱菲·阿桑特和马林巴·阿尼,他们可以说是非洲中心主义哲学基础的两位最重要的贡献者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书