Correlation between anti-mitochondrial antibodies and clinical serological and cirrhotic markers of primary biliary cholangitis

R. Jin, Xiaoxiao Wang, Lihua Wang, Hui Ma, Ji-lian Fang, Hao Wang, H. Rao, Lai Wei, B. Feng
{"title":"Correlation between anti-mitochondrial antibodies and clinical serological and cirrhotic markers of primary biliary cholangitis","authors":"R. Jin, Xiaoxiao Wang, Lihua Wang, Hui Ma, Ji-lian Fang, Hao Wang, H. Rao, Lai Wei, B. Feng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2020.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the correlation between the level of anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) and clinical indicators of first visited primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients with positive AMA. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom January 2013 to December 2016, the clinical data of 1 323 patients with positive AMA and/or AMA-M2 detected for the first time were collected through the Information System of Peking University People′s Hospital. Among them, 183 were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay, 431 were measured by immunoblotting, and 709 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients were divided into undiagnosed PBC group (non-PBC group, 973 cases) and newly diagnosed PBC group (new-PBC group, 350 cases including 268 cases of non-liver cirrhosis and 82 cases of liver cirrhosis); among 709 cases detected by ELISA, there were 567 cases in the non-PBC group and 142 cases in the new-PBC group (115 cases of non-liver cirrhosis PBC group and 27 cases of liver cirrhosis PBC group). Among 183 cases determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay, there were 118 cases in the non-PBC group and 65 cases in the new-PBC group. Among them 69 cases with low AMA titer (1∶40—1∶80) (53 cases of non-PBC group and 16 cases of new-PBC group), 95 cases with medium titer (1∶160—1∶320) (59 cases of non-PBC group and 36 cases of new-PBC group) and 19 cases with high titer (≥1∶640) (six cases of non-PBC group and 13 cases of new-PBC group). AMA levels among groups were compared, and its correlation with clinical serology and cirrhosis indicators of PBC including immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, platelet, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltranspeptadase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum total protein, serum albumin, total bilirubin (TBil), total cholesterol (TC), and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis (Fib-4) was analysed. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and linear regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nBy ELISA method, the median titer of AMA-M2 of 709 patients was 53 RU/mL, the serum AMA and AMA-M2 levels of new-PBC group were both higher than those of non-PBC group (1∶320 vs. 1∶80, 180 RU/mL vs. 47 RU/mL), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 14.111, Z = -7.531, both P 0.05). AMA-M2 value of patients in PBC with liver cirrhosis group was positively correlated with IgM level (r = 0.38, P = 0.039), but was not correlated with APRI and Fib-4 (all P > 0.05). The median of AMA value of 183 patients who underwent indirect immunofluorescence test was 1∶160. In non-PBC group, the IgM levels of patients with low, medium and high AMA titers gradually increased (the median levels were 1.2, 1.7 and 1.8 g/L, respectively); in new-PBC group, the levels of IgM, GGT and ALP of patients with low, medium and high AMA titers gradually increased (median IgM levels were 1.5, 3.7 and 4.1 g/L, respectively; GGT levels were 144, 182 and 317 U/L, respectively; and ALP levels were 137, 168 and 221 U/L, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =6.260, 7.081, 8.030, 15.226, all P<0.05). In non-PBC group, the median level of serum AMA-M2 of men was lower than that of women (41 RU/L vs. 50 RU/L), and the difference was statistically significant (Z = -2.945, P = 0.003). In new-PBC group, the median level of serum AMA-M2 of men tended to be lower than that of women (113 RU/mL vs. 206 RU/mL), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.257). \n \n \nConclusion \nSerum AMA level is correlated with many clinical parameters and may be related with the disease severity in patients with PBC. \n \n \nKey words: \nAnti-mitochondrial antibody; Primary biliary cholangitis; Liver cirrhosis; Clinical significance","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"11 1","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2020.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the correlation between the level of anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) and clinical indicators of first visited primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients with positive AMA. Methods From January 2013 to December 2016, the clinical data of 1 323 patients with positive AMA and/or AMA-M2 detected for the first time were collected through the Information System of Peking University People′s Hospital. Among them, 183 were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay, 431 were measured by immunoblotting, and 709 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients were divided into undiagnosed PBC group (non-PBC group, 973 cases) and newly diagnosed PBC group (new-PBC group, 350 cases including 268 cases of non-liver cirrhosis and 82 cases of liver cirrhosis); among 709 cases detected by ELISA, there were 567 cases in the non-PBC group and 142 cases in the new-PBC group (115 cases of non-liver cirrhosis PBC group and 27 cases of liver cirrhosis PBC group). Among 183 cases determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay, there were 118 cases in the non-PBC group and 65 cases in the new-PBC group. Among them 69 cases with low AMA titer (1∶40—1∶80) (53 cases of non-PBC group and 16 cases of new-PBC group), 95 cases with medium titer (1∶160—1∶320) (59 cases of non-PBC group and 36 cases of new-PBC group) and 19 cases with high titer (≥1∶640) (six cases of non-PBC group and 13 cases of new-PBC group). AMA levels among groups were compared, and its correlation with clinical serology and cirrhosis indicators of PBC including immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, platelet, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltranspeptadase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum total protein, serum albumin, total bilirubin (TBil), total cholesterol (TC), and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis (Fib-4) was analysed. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and linear regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis. Results By ELISA method, the median titer of AMA-M2 of 709 patients was 53 RU/mL, the serum AMA and AMA-M2 levels of new-PBC group were both higher than those of non-PBC group (1∶320 vs. 1∶80, 180 RU/mL vs. 47 RU/mL), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 14.111, Z = -7.531, both P 0.05). AMA-M2 value of patients in PBC with liver cirrhosis group was positively correlated with IgM level (r = 0.38, P = 0.039), but was not correlated with APRI and Fib-4 (all P > 0.05). The median of AMA value of 183 patients who underwent indirect immunofluorescence test was 1∶160. In non-PBC group, the IgM levels of patients with low, medium and high AMA titers gradually increased (the median levels were 1.2, 1.7 and 1.8 g/L, respectively); in new-PBC group, the levels of IgM, GGT and ALP of patients with low, medium and high AMA titers gradually increased (median IgM levels were 1.5, 3.7 and 4.1 g/L, respectively; GGT levels were 144, 182 and 317 U/L, respectively; and ALP levels were 137, 168 and 221 U/L, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =6.260, 7.081, 8.030, 15.226, all P<0.05). In non-PBC group, the median level of serum AMA-M2 of men was lower than that of women (41 RU/L vs. 50 RU/L), and the difference was statistically significant (Z = -2.945, P = 0.003). In new-PBC group, the median level of serum AMA-M2 of men tended to be lower than that of women (113 RU/mL vs. 206 RU/mL), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.257). Conclusion Serum AMA level is correlated with many clinical parameters and may be related with the disease severity in patients with PBC. Key words: Anti-mitochondrial antibody; Primary biliary cholangitis; Liver cirrhosis; Clinical significance
抗线粒体抗体与原发性胆管炎临床血清学及肝硬化标志物的相关性
目的探讨首次就诊的原发性胆管炎(PBC)患者抗线粒体抗体(AMA)水平与临床指标的相关性。方法收集2013年1月至2016年12月北京大学人民医院信息系统首次检测到AMA和(或)AMA- m2阳性患者1 323例的临床资料。其中间接免疫荧光法检测183例,免疫印迹法检测431例,酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测709例。将患者分为未确诊PBC组(非PBC组,973例)和新确诊PBC组(新确诊PBC组,350例,其中非肝硬化268例,肝硬化82例);ELISA检测的709例患者中,无PBC组567例,新PBC组142例(其中无肝硬化PBC组115例,肝硬化PBC组27例)。间接免疫荧光法测定的183例患者中,非pbc组118例,新pbc组65例。其中低滴度(1∶40 ~ 1∶80)69例(非pbc组53例,新pbc组16例),中滴度(1∶160 ~ 1∶320)95例(非pbc组59例,新pbc组36例),高滴度(≥1∶640)19例(非pbc组6例,新pbc组13例)。比较各组间AMA水平,并分析其与PBC临床血清学及肝硬化指标免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、IgM、血小板、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、血清总蛋白、血清白蛋白、总胆红素(TBil)、总胆固醇(TC)、天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)、纤维化(Fib-4)的相关性。采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和线性回归分析进行统计学分析。结果ELISA法检测709例患者血清AMA- m2滴度中位数为53 RU/mL,新发pbc组血清AMA、AMA- m2水平均高于非pbc组(1∶320 vs. 1∶80,180 RU/mL vs. 47 RU/mL),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 14.111, Z = -7.531, P均为0.05)。PBC合并肝硬化组患者AMA-M2值与IgM水平呈正相关(r = 0.38, P = 0.039),与APRI、Fib-4无相关性(均P > 0.05)。183例间接免疫荧光试验患者的AMA值中位数为1∶160。在非pbc组,低、中、高AMA滴度患者IgM水平逐渐升高(中位数分别为1.2、1.7、1.8 g/L);在新pbc组,低、中、高AMA滴度患者IgM、GGT、ALP水平逐渐升高(IgM水平中位数分别为1.5、3.7、4.1 g/L;GGT水平分别为144、182、317 U/L;ALP分别为137、168、221 U/L),差异均有统计学意义(χ2 =6.260、7.081、8.030、15.226,P均<0.05)。在非pbc组,男性血清AMA-M2中位水平低于女性(41 RU/L比50 RU/L),差异有统计学意义(Z = -2.945, P = 0.003)。在新发pbc组,男性血清AMA-M2中位水平有低于女性的趋势(113 RU/mL vs 206 RU/mL),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.257)。结论PBC患者血清AMA水平与多项临床指标相关,可能与病情严重程度有关。关键词:抗线粒体抗体;原发性胆管炎;肝硬化;临床意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信