Was Esarhaddon Considered to Be a God?

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
S. Nowicki
{"title":"Was Esarhaddon Considered to Be a God?","authors":"S. Nowicki","doi":"10.47979/AROR.J.83.2.217-232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present the actions of Ik-Tešub, a king of Šubria at the time of Esarhaddon’s invasion, and to explain them as ritual countermeasures. Unlike earlier interpretations, which focused on a scapegoat ritual, a simple substitute ritual or a symbolic act of surrender, my proposal is to interpret the behaviour of the Šubrian ruler as a substitute king ritual based not on Mesopotamian but Hittite magical traditions. Moreover, the shape of this particular ritual might indicate that Esarhaddon was seen not only as the powerful king and governor of Aššur but in fact also as the god of plague himself.","PeriodicalId":42258,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Orientalni","volume":"41 1","pages":"217-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Orientalni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47979/AROR.J.83.2.217-232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the actions of Ik-Tešub, a king of Šubria at the time of Esarhaddon’s invasion, and to explain them as ritual countermeasures. Unlike earlier interpretations, which focused on a scapegoat ritual, a simple substitute ritual or a symbolic act of surrender, my proposal is to interpret the behaviour of the Šubrian ruler as a substitute king ritual based not on Mesopotamian but Hittite magical traditions. Moreover, the shape of this particular ritual might indicate that Esarhaddon was seen not only as the powerful king and governor of Aššur but in fact also as the god of plague himself.
以撒哈顿被认为是神吗?
本文的目的是在以撒哈顿入侵时,呈现Šubria国王Ik-Tešub的行动,并将其解释为仪式对策。与早期的解释不同,这些解释侧重于替罪羊仪式,简单的替代仪式或投降的象征性行为,我的建议是将Šubrian统治者的行为解释为替代国王仪式,而不是基于美索不达米亚,而是赫梯的魔法传统。此外,这种特殊仪式的形式可能表明,以撒哈顿不仅被视为Aššur强大的国王和统治者,实际上也被视为瘟疫之神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archiv Orientalni
Archiv Orientalni Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信