William Lane Craig. In Quest of the Historical Adam: A Biblical and Scientific Exploration

D. Spencer
{"title":"William Lane Craig. In Quest of the Historical Adam: A Biblical and Scientific Exploration","authors":"D. Spencer","doi":"10.12978/jat.2022-10.030011181517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I don’t think it terribly bold to say up front that William Lane Craig’s In Quest of the Historical Adam is one of the best, if not the best, of its kind—and this for two reasons. First, the clarity, analytic rigor, and attention to detail we have come to expect from Craig is on full display throughout the manuscript, and his nuanced and penetrating treatment of diverse (though interrelated) issues contained therein comes as a breath of strikingly fresh air in a region of Christian theology which, all too often, is decidedly lacking in these scholarly virtues. Secondly, Craig’s book is basically sui generis: an analytic philosopher’s wide-ranging treatment of the most fundamental exegetical and scientific issues pertaining to the question of a historical Adam. It is an ambitious cross-disciplinary work few would even consider attempting; Craig, however, pulls it off remarkably well. These undeniable merits do not by themselves, of course, guarantee the ultimate success of the book’s argument. This latter question will be explored in the second part of this review. First, however, I shall summarize the book’s contents, laying stress on what I take to be the elements—both strengths and weaknesses—most pertinent to Craig’s overall case.","PeriodicalId":14947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytic Theology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2022-10.030011181517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I don’t think it terribly bold to say up front that William Lane Craig’s In Quest of the Historical Adam is one of the best, if not the best, of its kind—and this for two reasons. First, the clarity, analytic rigor, and attention to detail we have come to expect from Craig is on full display throughout the manuscript, and his nuanced and penetrating treatment of diverse (though interrelated) issues contained therein comes as a breath of strikingly fresh air in a region of Christian theology which, all too often, is decidedly lacking in these scholarly virtues. Secondly, Craig’s book is basically sui generis: an analytic philosopher’s wide-ranging treatment of the most fundamental exegetical and scientific issues pertaining to the question of a historical Adam. It is an ambitious cross-disciplinary work few would even consider attempting; Craig, however, pulls it off remarkably well. These undeniable merits do not by themselves, of course, guarantee the ultimate success of the book’s argument. This latter question will be explored in the second part of this review. First, however, I shall summarize the book’s contents, laying stress on what I take to be the elements—both strengths and weaknesses—most pertinent to Craig’s overall case.
威廉·莱恩·克雷格。追寻历史上的亚当:圣经与科学的探索
我不认为事先说威廉·莱恩·克雷格的《追寻历史上的亚当》是最好的,如果不是最好的,这是非常大胆的,这有两个原因。首先,我们所期待的克雷格的清晰、严谨的分析和对细节的关注在整个手稿中得到了充分的展示,他对其中包含的各种(尽管是相互关联的)问题的细致入微和深入的处理,在基督教神学领域带来了一股惊人的新鲜空气,而基督教神学领域往往明显缺乏这些学术美德。其次,克雷格的书基本上是自成一体的:一位分析哲学家对与历史亚当问题有关的最基本的训诂学和科学问题进行了广泛的处理。这是一项雄心勃勃的跨学科工作,甚至很少有人会考虑尝试;然而,克雷格却做得非常好。当然,这些不可否认的优点本身并不能保证本书论点的最终成功。后一个问题将在本评论的第二部分探讨。然而,首先,我将总结这本书的内容,重点放在我认为与克雷格的整个案例最相关的元素上——包括优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信