Effectiveness of a Protective Ventilatory Strategy Using Prone Decubitus in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) after Covid-19: Integrate Review

Ribeiro Daniela Alves de Moraes, Cavalcante Fabrício Vieira
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Protective Ventilatory Strategy Using Prone Decubitus in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) after Covid-19: Integrate Review","authors":"Ribeiro Daniela Alves de Moraes, Cavalcante Fabrício Vieira","doi":"10.23937/2474-3674/1510137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The main objective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of the ventilatory strategy in decubitus in the prone position in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome triggered by Covid-19. Method: This is an integrative literature review combined with the snowball technique, based on the following question: “What are the effects of the protective ventilatory strategy in prone decubitus in patients with SARS secondary to Covid-19? PUBMED and Academic Google were used as database, using the descriptors Artificial Respiration, Mechanical Ventilation, Cannula nasal high-flow, Pronation and Covid-19, from March 2020 to April 2021. Results: Seven articles were analyzed. The theoretical bases that supported this study are based on various sources, but may have as guiding elements the publications of the Ministry of Health, establishing an overview of conducts in respiratory treatments during the pandemic, combined with empirical research and perspectives, noting that in 10 SARS patients, all intubated, 6 of them were submitted to standard and PP position, 3 to PP and 1 only to standard, with satisfactory results. Similar research indicates that the prone position provides an increase in saturation to 95.9%, a decrease in pain complaints, an improvement in oxygenation and a decrease in mortality. Conclusion: The findings obtained from this scenario involving the various sources consulted were that the practice based on scientific evidence ensures quality care and offers subsidies that provide knowledge and updating. Although PP has been elucidated since 2008, with the pandemic this became more evident and showed that it is effective in improving the oxygenation of patients with a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio ≤ 150 mmHg and safe to be applied, as long as the institution train and qualify the team involved in the maneuver process and that they have strict controls and follow-up on possible complications.","PeriodicalId":13937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3674/1510137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of the ventilatory strategy in decubitus in the prone position in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome triggered by Covid-19. Method: This is an integrative literature review combined with the snowball technique, based on the following question: “What are the effects of the protective ventilatory strategy in prone decubitus in patients with SARS secondary to Covid-19? PUBMED and Academic Google were used as database, using the descriptors Artificial Respiration, Mechanical Ventilation, Cannula nasal high-flow, Pronation and Covid-19, from March 2020 to April 2021. Results: Seven articles were analyzed. The theoretical bases that supported this study are based on various sources, but may have as guiding elements the publications of the Ministry of Health, establishing an overview of conducts in respiratory treatments during the pandemic, combined with empirical research and perspectives, noting that in 10 SARS patients, all intubated, 6 of them were submitted to standard and PP position, 3 to PP and 1 only to standard, with satisfactory results. Similar research indicates that the prone position provides an increase in saturation to 95.9%, a decrease in pain complaints, an improvement in oxygenation and a decrease in mortality. Conclusion: The findings obtained from this scenario involving the various sources consulted were that the practice based on scientific evidence ensures quality care and offers subsidies that provide knowledge and updating. Although PP has been elucidated since 2008, with the pandemic this became more evident and showed that it is effective in improving the oxygenation of patients with a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio ≤ 150 mmHg and safe to be applied, as long as the institution train and qualify the team involved in the maneuver process and that they have strict controls and follow-up on possible complications.
Covid-19后严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)患者采用俯卧位保护性通气策略的有效性:综合综述
目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨Covid-19引发的严重急性呼吸综合征患者俯卧位通气策略的有效性。方法:基于以下问题,结合滚雪球技术进行综合文献综述:“保护性通气策略对Covid-19继发SARS患者俯卧位的效果如何?”以PUBMED和学术谷歌为数据库,使用描述词人工呼吸、机械通气、鼻高流量插管、旋前和Covid-19,时间为2020年3月至2021年4月。结果:对7篇文献进行分析。支持这项研究的理论基础来自各种来源,但可以将卫生部的出版物作为指导要素,这些出版物概述了大流行期间呼吸系统治疗的行为,并结合实证研究和观点,注意到在10名非典型肺炎患者中,所有患者均插管,其中6人被提交到标准和PP位置,3人被提交到PP位置,1人仅提交到标准位置,结果令人满意。类似的研究表明,俯卧位可以将饱和度提高到95.9%,减少疼痛,改善氧合,降低死亡率。结论:从该方案中获得的结果涉及各种来源的咨询是,基于科学证据的实践确保了高质量的护理,并提供了提供知识和更新的补贴。虽然PP自2008年以来已被阐明,但随着大流行,这一点变得更加明显,并表明它在改善PaO 2 /FiO 2比率≤150 mmHg的患者的氧合方面是有效的,并且可以安全应用,只要机构培训和合格参与操作过程的团队,并且他们严格控制和随访可能的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信