The Role of Roughness in Random Superhydrophobic Surfaces

{"title":"The Role of Roughness in Random Superhydrophobic Surfaces","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ijnn.03.02.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the role of roughness in superhydrophobic coatings a variety of superhydrophobic and non-superhydrophobic\nsurfaces were synthesized using various polymer binders, nanosilica particles and fluoro chemistry on both glass and\npolycarbonate substrates. The roughness of the coatings was measured by profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM)\nand analyzed by a variety of statistical methods. Superhydrophobic surfaces showed a peak to peak distance below 5\nmicrons and a radius of less than 0.5 micron, but this information alone was insufficient to predict superhydrophobicity. The\nskewness and kurtosis for the surfaces indicated that all coated samples, both superhydrophobic and non-superhydrophobic,\nhad a random Gaussian roughness distribution, but there was no significant difference in the skewness and kurtosis values\nfor either superhydrophobic or non-superhydrophobic surfaces. The power spectral density function (PSDF) was found\nto be an effective tool to predict the required roughness for superhydrophobicity and provides information over the entire\nrange of length scales.\nThe average peak radius for the micro and nano scales calculated from ACL and RMS values were found to be less than\n3 µm and 520 nm, respectively, which supports the accepted theory is that superhydrophobic surfaces require tightly\npacked asperities and small micron and nano roughness. The characterization of the surfaces allowed experimental\nverification of theoretical models for the roughness factor and critical roughness parameters. It was found that the\nRMS/ACL values should be 0.35 or higher for designing surfaces with contact angles above 150°. This work shows\na unique method for measuring, quantifying, and understanding the role of roughness, that can be used to design\nsurfaces for superhydrophobicity and future applications such as self-cleaning, icephobicity, anti-biofouling, corrosion\nresistance, and water repellency.","PeriodicalId":91888,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nanotechnology and nanomedicine","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nanotechnology and nanomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijnn.03.02.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To investigate the role of roughness in superhydrophobic coatings a variety of superhydrophobic and non-superhydrophobic surfaces were synthesized using various polymer binders, nanosilica particles and fluoro chemistry on both glass and polycarbonate substrates. The roughness of the coatings was measured by profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM) and analyzed by a variety of statistical methods. Superhydrophobic surfaces showed a peak to peak distance below 5 microns and a radius of less than 0.5 micron, but this information alone was insufficient to predict superhydrophobicity. The skewness and kurtosis for the surfaces indicated that all coated samples, both superhydrophobic and non-superhydrophobic, had a random Gaussian roughness distribution, but there was no significant difference in the skewness and kurtosis values for either superhydrophobic or non-superhydrophobic surfaces. The power spectral density function (PSDF) was found to be an effective tool to predict the required roughness for superhydrophobicity and provides information over the entire range of length scales. The average peak radius for the micro and nano scales calculated from ACL and RMS values were found to be less than 3 µm and 520 nm, respectively, which supports the accepted theory is that superhydrophobic surfaces require tightly packed asperities and small micron and nano roughness. The characterization of the surfaces allowed experimental verification of theoretical models for the roughness factor and critical roughness parameters. It was found that the RMS/ACL values should be 0.35 or higher for designing surfaces with contact angles above 150°. This work shows a unique method for measuring, quantifying, and understanding the role of roughness, that can be used to design surfaces for superhydrophobicity and future applications such as self-cleaning, icephobicity, anti-biofouling, corrosion resistance, and water repellency.
粗糙度在随机超疏水表面中的作用
为了研究粗糙度在超疏水涂层中的作用,在玻璃和聚碳酸酯衬底上使用不同的聚合物粘合剂、纳米二氧化硅颗粒和氟化学合成了各种超疏水和非超疏水表面。用轮廓术和原子力显微镜(AFM)测量了涂层的粗糙度,并用各种统计方法进行了分析。超疏水表面峰间距离小于5微米,半径小于0.5微米,但仅凭这些信息不足以预测其超疏水性。表面的偏度和峰度表明,所有涂层样品,无论是超疏水还是非超疏水,都具有随机的高斯粗糙度分布,但无论是超疏水表面还是非超疏水表面,偏度和峰度值都没有显着差异。功率谱密度函数(PSDF)被认为是预测超疏水性所需粗糙度的有效工具,并提供了整个长度尺度的信息。从ACL和RMS值计算的微纳米尺度的平均峰半径分别小于3µm和520 nm,这支持了公认的理论,即超疏水表面需要紧密堆积的凹凸不平和小的微米和纳米粗糙度。表面的表征允许对粗糙度因子和临界粗糙度参数的理论模型进行实验验证。研究发现,对于接触角大于150°的表面设计,theRMS/ACL值应大于等于0.35。这项工作展示了一种独特的方法来测量、量化和理解粗糙度的作用,可用于设计超疏水性和未来应用的表面,如自清洁、疏冰、抗生物污染、耐腐蚀性和拒水性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信