Incomplete information and certain answers in general data models

L. Libkin
{"title":"Incomplete information and certain answers in general data models","authors":"L. Libkin","doi":"10.1145/1989284.1989294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While incomplete information is ubiquitous in all data models - especially in applications involving data translation or integration - our understanding of it is still not completely satisfactory. For example, even such a basic notion as certain answers for XML queries was only introduced recently, and in a way seemingly rather different from relational certain answers.\n The goal of this paper is to introduce a general approach to handling incompleteness, and to test its applicability in known data models such as relations and documents. The approach is based on representing degrees of incompleteness via semantics-based orderings on database objects. We use it to both obtain new results on incompleteness and to explain some previously observed phenomena. Specifically we show that certain answers for relational and XML queries are two instances of the same general concept; we describe structural properties behind the naive evaluation of queries; answer open questions on the existence of certain answers in the XML setting; and show that previously studied ordering-based approaches were only adequate for SQL's primitive view of nulls. We define a general setting that subsumes relations and documents to help us explain in a uniform way how to compute certain answers, and when good solutions can be found in data exchange. We also look at the complexity of common problems related to incompleteness, and generalize several results from relational and XML contexts.","PeriodicalId":92118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","volume":"63 1","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1989284.1989294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

While incomplete information is ubiquitous in all data models - especially in applications involving data translation or integration - our understanding of it is still not completely satisfactory. For example, even such a basic notion as certain answers for XML queries was only introduced recently, and in a way seemingly rather different from relational certain answers. The goal of this paper is to introduce a general approach to handling incompleteness, and to test its applicability in known data models such as relations and documents. The approach is based on representing degrees of incompleteness via semantics-based orderings on database objects. We use it to both obtain new results on incompleteness and to explain some previously observed phenomena. Specifically we show that certain answers for relational and XML queries are two instances of the same general concept; we describe structural properties behind the naive evaluation of queries; answer open questions on the existence of certain answers in the XML setting; and show that previously studied ordering-based approaches were only adequate for SQL's primitive view of nulls. We define a general setting that subsumes relations and documents to help us explain in a uniform way how to compute certain answers, and when good solutions can be found in data exchange. We also look at the complexity of common problems related to incompleteness, and generalize several results from relational and XML contexts.
一般数据模型中的不完整信息和特定答案
虽然不完整信息在所有数据模型中普遍存在——特别是在涉及数据转换或集成的应用程序中——但我们对它的理解仍然不完全令人满意。例如,甚至像XML查询的特定答案这样的基本概念也是最近才引入的,并且以一种看起来与关系特定答案相当不同的方式引入。本文的目标是介绍一种处理不完整性的通用方法,并测试其在已知数据模型(如关系和文档)中的适用性。该方法基于通过数据库对象上基于语义的排序来表示不完整程度。我们用它来获得关于不完备性的新结果和解释一些以前观察到的现象。具体来说,我们展示了关系查询和XML查询的某些答案是同一一般概念的两个实例;我们描述了查询朴素求值背后的结构属性;回答关于XML设置中是否存在某些答案的开放性问题;并表明先前研究的基于排序的方法仅适用于SQL的null基本视图。我们定义了一个包含关系和文档的通用设置,以帮助我们以统一的方式解释如何计算某些答案,以及何时可以在数据交换中找到好的解决方案。我们还研究了与不完整性相关的常见问题的复杂性,并从关系和XML上下文中归纳了几个结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信