Deformation Properties of Stone Columns Back-calculated from Static Load Tests

Houman Soleimani Fard
{"title":"Deformation Properties of Stone Columns Back-calculated from Static Load Tests","authors":"Houman Soleimani Fard","doi":"10.2478/sspjce-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The stone column is a cost-effective, sustainable, and technically sound ground improvement solution for enhancing bearing capacity, minimizing settlement, and mitigating the liquefaction potential of a wide range of soils. In this study, the main methods of stone column execution are briefly explained, design approaches are discussed, and testing procedures are elaborated on in more detail. The results of plate load tests (PLT) are numerically simulated to back-calculate stone column properties. In this research, the Hardening Soil model (HS) is selected to simulate stone columns and soil profiles. The outcomes of this modelling and the adopted calculation approach are verified by three-zone load tests (ZLT) performed on grounds reinforced by stone columns in various projects. Reasonably good matches are observed between experimental and numerical results, approving parameters back-analyzed from PLTs and the employed calculation methodology. Finally, a widely used analytical approach of the calculation of stone columns (Priebe method) is compared with the numerical and experimental results of the studied ZLTs. The comparison confirmed that the Priebe method could practically calculate the settlement of grounds treated by stone columns although settlements were slightly higher than experimentally observed values. In the end, the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed.","PeriodicalId":30755,"journal":{"name":"Selected Scientific Papers Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"73 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selected Scientific Papers Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sspjce-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The stone column is a cost-effective, sustainable, and technically sound ground improvement solution for enhancing bearing capacity, minimizing settlement, and mitigating the liquefaction potential of a wide range of soils. In this study, the main methods of stone column execution are briefly explained, design approaches are discussed, and testing procedures are elaborated on in more detail. The results of plate load tests (PLT) are numerically simulated to back-calculate stone column properties. In this research, the Hardening Soil model (HS) is selected to simulate stone columns and soil profiles. The outcomes of this modelling and the adopted calculation approach are verified by three-zone load tests (ZLT) performed on grounds reinforced by stone columns in various projects. Reasonably good matches are observed between experimental and numerical results, approving parameters back-analyzed from PLTs and the employed calculation methodology. Finally, a widely used analytical approach of the calculation of stone columns (Priebe method) is compared with the numerical and experimental results of the studied ZLTs. The comparison confirmed that the Priebe method could practically calculate the settlement of grounds treated by stone columns although settlements were slightly higher than experimentally observed values. In the end, the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed.
静载试验反算石柱变形特性
石柱是一种具有成本效益,可持续发展,技术上合理的地基改善解决方案,可提高承载力,减少沉降,减轻各种土壤的液化潜力。本文简要说明了石柱施工的主要方法,讨论了设计方法,并详细阐述了测试程序。对板载试验结果进行了数值模拟,反演了石柱的性能。在本研究中,选择硬化土模型(HS)来模拟石柱和土壤剖面。该模型的结果和所采用的计算方法通过在不同工程的石柱加固地基上进行的三区荷载试验(ZLT)得到验证。实验结果与数值结果吻合较好,验证了从plt反演的参数和所采用的计算方法。最后,将一种广泛应用的石柱解析计算方法(Priebe法)与所研究的ZLTs的数值和实验结果进行了比较。通过对比,证实了Priebe方法可以较好地计算石柱处理地基的沉降,但沉降值略高于实验观测值。最后,讨论了每种方法的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信