Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An appraisal from a private practice

M. Swart, G. Joubert
{"title":"Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An appraisal from a private practice","authors":"M. Swart, G. Joubert","doi":"10.24170/16-1-3408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The systemic inflammatory response associated with cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is detrimental to organ function in varying degrees. Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) assumes an attenuation of these deleterious effects. The aim of this study was to compare conventional CPB (CCPB) with MECC, in a population of patients who had their CABG done in a private practice in South Africa. Methods: Two historical cohort analytical studies were done on patients who had isolated CABG done by one surgeon in the Mediclinic Bloemfontein. Patients who had their CABG done using CCPB were compared statistically using logistic regression to those who had their CABG done with MECC. A propensity score matching was also used to compare the 2 groups. In a second follow-up study, a once-off lactate on arrival in the intensive care unit was compared. A qualitative assessment of the technique by the various role-players in theatre was added to the initial study. Results: The primary CCPB group had 1 572 patients. The MECC group comprised 367 patients. No statistically significant outcome difference was found in terms of mortality, major morbidity, post-operative blood loss or usage of homologous blood. Once the 2 groups were evenly matched, patients with MECC had a better serum creatinine postoperatively, but renal dialysis could not be avoided. Patients with MECC also had a statistically shorter hospital stay. The second study (CCPB n=63 and MECC n=100) confirmed the shorter hospital stay. There was no difference in the lactate value between the 2 groups. In general, there are varying levels of enthusiasm among the theatre specialists for a MECC strategy. Conclusions: MECC protects the kidneys, but not so much against renal dialysis. MECC patients could stay for a somewhat shorter time in hospital. Tissue perfusion based on a once-off lactate level was equal. MECC might be technically more demanding. This article is an important addition to the literature that adds a local perspective.","PeriodicalId":55781,"journal":{"name":"SA Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24170/16-1-3408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The systemic inflammatory response associated with cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is detrimental to organ function in varying degrees. Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) assumes an attenuation of these deleterious effects. The aim of this study was to compare conventional CPB (CCPB) with MECC, in a population of patients who had their CABG done in a private practice in South Africa. Methods: Two historical cohort analytical studies were done on patients who had isolated CABG done by one surgeon in the Mediclinic Bloemfontein. Patients who had their CABG done using CCPB were compared statistically using logistic regression to those who had their CABG done with MECC. A propensity score matching was also used to compare the 2 groups. In a second follow-up study, a once-off lactate on arrival in the intensive care unit was compared. A qualitative assessment of the technique by the various role-players in theatre was added to the initial study. Results: The primary CCPB group had 1 572 patients. The MECC group comprised 367 patients. No statistically significant outcome difference was found in terms of mortality, major morbidity, post-operative blood loss or usage of homologous blood. Once the 2 groups were evenly matched, patients with MECC had a better serum creatinine postoperatively, but renal dialysis could not be avoided. Patients with MECC also had a statistically shorter hospital stay. The second study (CCPB n=63 and MECC n=100) confirmed the shorter hospital stay. There was no difference in the lactate value between the 2 groups. In general, there are varying levels of enthusiasm among the theatre specialists for a MECC strategy. Conclusions: MECC protects the kidneys, but not so much against renal dialysis. MECC patients could stay for a somewhat shorter time in hospital. Tissue perfusion based on a once-off lactate level was equal. MECC might be technically more demanding. This article is an important addition to the literature that adds a local perspective.
最小体外循环:来自私人实践的评估
导论:心肺旁路术(CPB)相关的全身炎症反应不同程度地损害器官功能。最小体外循环(MECC)假定这些有害影响的衰减。本研究的目的是比较传统CPB (CCPB)与MECC,在南非的私人诊所完成CABG的患者群体中。方法:对布隆方丹医院一名外科医生行孤立性冠脉搭桥的患者进行两项历史队列分析研究。使用CCPB完成CABG的患者与使用MECC完成CABG的患者使用logistic回归进行统计学比较。还使用倾向评分匹配来比较两组。在第二个随访研究中,比较了到达重症监护室时的一次性乳酸。在最初的研究中增加了对戏剧中各种角色扮演者的技术的定性评估。结果:原发性CCPB组1 572例。MECC组包括367例患者。两组在死亡率、主要发病率、术后出血量或异体血使用方面无统计学差异。一旦两组平均匹配,MECC患者术后血清肌酐较好,但无法避免肾透析。MECC患者的住院时间也较短。第二项研究(CCPB n=63, MECC n=100)证实了较短的住院时间。两组间乳酸值无显著差异。总的来说,戏剧专家对MECC战略的热情程度各不相同。结论:MECC对肾脏有保护作用,但对肾透析作用不明显。MECC患者可以在医院停留较短的时间。以一次性乳酸水平为基础的组织灌注相等。MECC在技术上可能要求更高。这篇文章是对文献的重要补充,增加了当地的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信