Comparing PV simulation models and methods with outdoor measurements

S. Ransome
{"title":"Comparing PV simulation models and methods with outdoor measurements","authors":"S. Ransome","doi":"10.1109/PVSC.2010.5615829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several recent independent kWh/kWp studies have found similar energy yields (<±5%) for various c-Si and thin films without any consistent technology bias [1]. A comparison of various modelling methods such as the matrix method, 1 or 2 diode models, SV method and empirical equations has been performed to see how they predict PV performance. The values of thermal and low light level coefficients used in some simulation models have been found to be different from what is measured to IEC standards [2], [3], [4]. These discrepancies mean simulation programs often predict larger variations between technologies and usually favouring thin films [5]. Suggestions are made as to the best way to predict and validate system performance.","PeriodicalId":6424,"journal":{"name":"2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference","volume":"88 1","pages":"002306-002311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2010.5615829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Several recent independent kWh/kWp studies have found similar energy yields (<±5%) for various c-Si and thin films without any consistent technology bias [1]. A comparison of various modelling methods such as the matrix method, 1 or 2 diode models, SV method and empirical equations has been performed to see how they predict PV performance. The values of thermal and low light level coefficients used in some simulation models have been found to be different from what is measured to IEC standards [2], [3], [4]. These discrepancies mean simulation programs often predict larger variations between technologies and usually favouring thin films [5]. Suggestions are made as to the best way to predict and validate system performance.
光伏仿真模型和方法与室外测量的比较
最近几项独立的kWh/kWp研究发现,在没有任何一致的技术偏差[1]的情况下,各种c-Si和薄膜的能量产量相似(<±5%)。比较了各种建模方法,如矩阵法、1或2二极管模型、SV方法和经验方程,以了解它们如何预测PV性能。在一些模拟模型中使用的热和弱光系数值已被发现与IEC标准[2],[3],[4]的测量值不同。这些差异意味着模拟程序经常预测技术之间的较大差异,通常倾向于薄膜。提出了预测和验证系统性能的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信