Erotic Power Futures/Relations That Matter

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
W. Pillow
{"title":"Erotic Power Futures/Relations That Matter","authors":"W. Pillow","doi":"10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New materialist and posthumanist studies lack accounting of colonial impact on how we think about who is and is not human. In this essay, I posit questions of what is real, who is human, and who we are in relation to each other. These questions, which are key to inquiry and posthuman relationalities, must be thought with Tiffany Lethabo King's “decolonial refusal,” a relational stance offering radical possibilities. In example, I turn to Audre Lorde's “erotic power” thought with adrienne maree brown's “pleasure activism” focusing not only on how we do research, but also on how we feel in relations of research. This move opens potentials for engaging in research relations that matter.","PeriodicalId":36478,"journal":{"name":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"40-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

New materialist and posthumanist studies lack accounting of colonial impact on how we think about who is and is not human. In this essay, I posit questions of what is real, who is human, and who we are in relation to each other. These questions, which are key to inquiry and posthuman relationalities, must be thought with Tiffany Lethabo King's “decolonial refusal,” a relational stance offering radical possibilities. In example, I turn to Audre Lorde's “erotic power” thought with adrienne maree brown's “pleasure activism” focusing not only on how we do research, but also on how we feel in relations of research. This move opens potentials for engaging in research relations that matter.
情爱力量的未来/重要的关系
新唯物主义和后人文主义的研究缺乏殖民对我们如何思考谁是人类和谁不是人类的影响。在这篇文章中,我提出了一些问题:什么是真实的,谁是人类,我们彼此之间是谁。这些问题是探究和后人类关系的关键,必须与蒂芙尼·莱斯博·金的“非殖民化拒绝”一起思考,这种关系立场提供了激进的可能性。例如,我将奥德雷·洛德的“情爱力量”思想与阿德里安娜·马雷·布朗的“快乐行动主义”结合起来,不仅关注我们如何进行研究,还关注我们在研究关系中的感受。这一举动打开了参与重要研究关系的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信