Determinants of Ukraine’s geopolitical orientation

M. Kowalski
{"title":"Determinants of Ukraine’s geopolitical orientation","authors":"M. Kowalski","doi":"10.12657/czageo-93-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Russian side often talks about the special ties between Russia and Ukraine. This assumption underlies the Russian geopolitical doctrine. Nevertheless, Ukraine does not share this view, wishing to be a sovereign and independent state. Russia cannot understand that, however, being stuck in its imperial myth and one-sided interpretation of former and today’s determinants. Meanwhile, Russians and Ukrainians were moulded by different historical circumstances, which was manifested in the emergence of two distinct languages and national traditions. In addition, historical processes tied Ukrainians more closely to the freedom traditions of the West, while the Russians were much more exposed to the impact of the despotic East, which was one of the main factors behind the distinctive features of both nations. The existence within the borders of one state for 200–300 years did not erase these differences. The emancipation of people’s masses that took place from the mid-19th century made the distinctive features more visible and had to lead to political divisions. For this reason, even the USSR was constituted as a union. This fact, however, did not prevent its dissolution. As a result, Ukraine has been an independent country for three decades. Russian actions counteracting these tendencies, strengthened even more the sense of distinctiveness of Ukrainians and their western civilisational and geopolitical orientation. Owing to this fact, Russia’s integrative actions against Ukraine, carried out by imperial and despotic methods, are doomed to failure.","PeriodicalId":84538,"journal":{"name":"Czasopismo geograficzne : kwartalnik Zrzeszenia Pol. Nauczycieli Geografji, Towarzystwa Geograficznego we Lwowie i Towarzystwa Geograficznego w Poznaniu","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czasopismo geograficzne : kwartalnik Zrzeszenia Pol. Nauczycieli Geografji, Towarzystwa Geograficznego we Lwowie i Towarzystwa Geograficznego w Poznaniu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12657/czageo-93-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Russian side often talks about the special ties between Russia and Ukraine. This assumption underlies the Russian geopolitical doctrine. Nevertheless, Ukraine does not share this view, wishing to be a sovereign and independent state. Russia cannot understand that, however, being stuck in its imperial myth and one-sided interpretation of former and today’s determinants. Meanwhile, Russians and Ukrainians were moulded by different historical circumstances, which was manifested in the emergence of two distinct languages and national traditions. In addition, historical processes tied Ukrainians more closely to the freedom traditions of the West, while the Russians were much more exposed to the impact of the despotic East, which was one of the main factors behind the distinctive features of both nations. The existence within the borders of one state for 200–300 years did not erase these differences. The emancipation of people’s masses that took place from the mid-19th century made the distinctive features more visible and had to lead to political divisions. For this reason, even the USSR was constituted as a union. This fact, however, did not prevent its dissolution. As a result, Ukraine has been an independent country for three decades. Russian actions counteracting these tendencies, strengthened even more the sense of distinctiveness of Ukrainians and their western civilisational and geopolitical orientation. Owing to this fact, Russia’s integrative actions against Ukraine, carried out by imperial and despotic methods, are doomed to failure.
乌克兰地缘政治取向的决定因素
俄方经常谈及俄乌之间的特殊关系。这一假设构成了俄罗斯地缘政治学说的基础。然而,乌克兰不同意这种观点,它希望成为一个主权和独立的国家。然而,俄罗斯无法理解这一点,因为它陷入了自己的帝国神话,对过去和今天的决定因素做出了片面的解释。同时,俄罗斯人和乌克兰人是由不同的历史环境塑造的,这表现在两种截然不同的语言和民族传统的产生上。此外,历史进程将乌克兰人更紧密地与西方的自由传统联系在一起,而俄罗斯人则更容易受到专制的东方的影响,这是两个国家独特特征背后的主要因素之一。在一个国家的边界内存在200-300年并没有消除这些差异。从19世纪中期开始,人民群众的解放使鲜明的特征更加明显,并不得不导致政治分裂。由于这个原因,甚至苏联也被建立为一个联盟。然而,这一事实并没有阻止它的解散。因此,乌克兰作为一个独立国家已经有三十年了。俄罗斯与这些趋势背道而驰的行动,进一步强化了乌克兰人的独特性,以及他们的西方文明和地缘政治取向。由于这一事实,俄罗斯以帝国主义和专制手段对乌克兰采取的综合行动注定要失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信