Safety and toxicity of cabozantinib monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a Russian multicenter observational study

Q4 Medicine
M. Volkova, A. Kalpinskiy, K. Menshikov, L. V. Gorbuleva, A. Sultanbaev, O. Evsyukova, Varazdat R. Meltonian, S. Mishugin, Mikhail R. Maturov, A. Olshanskaya, Dmitrii Iu. Shemetov, T. Sannikova, M. V. Makhnutina, Marina A. Filipieva, Elena A. Gaijsina, E. Ovchinnikova, Ovsep A. Mailian, B. Alekseev, V. Matveev
{"title":"Safety and toxicity of cabozantinib monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a Russian multicenter observational study","authors":"M. Volkova, A. Kalpinskiy, K. Menshikov, L. V. Gorbuleva, A. Sultanbaev, O. Evsyukova, Varazdat R. Meltonian, S. Mishugin, Mikhail R. Maturov, A. Olshanskaya, Dmitrii Iu. Shemetov, T. Sannikova, M. V. Makhnutina, Marina A. Filipieva, Elena A. Gaijsina, E. Ovchinnikova, Ovsep A. Mailian, B. Alekseev, V. Matveev","doi":"10.26442/18151434.2023.2.202262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess the safety and to analyze an influence of cabozantinib monotherapy toxicity on treatment efficacy in unselected Russian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). \nMaterials and methods. Medical data of 92 patients with verified mRCC were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 56 (1979) years, most of them - 60 (65.2%) were of male gender. Twenty five (27.2%) persons had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). At the time of cabozantinib monotherapy start 5 (5.4%) patients had favorable, 54 (58.7%) intermediate, and 33 (35.9%) unfavorable prognosis by International Metastatic Renal Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) model. Eighty-three (90.2%) patients were pretreated, including 76 (82.6%) patients who previously received anti-angiogenic agents. All patients were administered with cabozantinib monotherapy (60 mg/day); dose adjustment was performed according to the instruction. \nResults. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 81 (88.0%) of 92 patients; 30 (32.6%) AEs were grade 34. Toxicity-related dose reduction of cabozantinib was required in 28 (30.4%), treatment interruption in 15 (16.3%), and discontinuation in 2 (2.2%) patients. The most common AEs were hypertension (69 patients, 75.0%), asthenia (47 patients, 51.1%), diarrhea (43 patients, 46.7%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (43 patients, 46.7%). The most common severe AEs were: arterial hypertension (17 patients, 18.5%), diarrhea (6 patients, 6.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2 patients, 2.2%). The most frequent laboratory abnormalities during therapy were elevated serum transaminases (33 patients, 35.9%), anemia (13 patients, 14.1%), and thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 10.9%). No previously unreported AEs or laboratory abnormalities were observed. There was a significant increase in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.05.9; p=0.046) and overall survival (hazard ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval 1.28.3; p0.025) in patients with treatment-related arterial hypertension. \nConclusion. The observational study confirmed the acceptable safety profile of cabozantinib in the first and subsequent lines of treatment in mRCC patients. No new safety signals were identified. Treatment-related arterial hypertension may be a favorable predictor of survival.","PeriodicalId":16401,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Oncology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.2.202262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To assess the safety and to analyze an influence of cabozantinib monotherapy toxicity on treatment efficacy in unselected Russian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Materials and methods. Medical data of 92 patients with verified mRCC were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 56 (1979) years, most of them - 60 (65.2%) were of male gender. Twenty five (27.2%) persons had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). At the time of cabozantinib monotherapy start 5 (5.4%) patients had favorable, 54 (58.7%) intermediate, and 33 (35.9%) unfavorable prognosis by International Metastatic Renal Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) model. Eighty-three (90.2%) patients were pretreated, including 76 (82.6%) patients who previously received anti-angiogenic agents. All patients were administered with cabozantinib monotherapy (60 mg/day); dose adjustment was performed according to the instruction. Results. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 81 (88.0%) of 92 patients; 30 (32.6%) AEs were grade 34. Toxicity-related dose reduction of cabozantinib was required in 28 (30.4%), treatment interruption in 15 (16.3%), and discontinuation in 2 (2.2%) patients. The most common AEs were hypertension (69 patients, 75.0%), asthenia (47 patients, 51.1%), diarrhea (43 patients, 46.7%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (43 patients, 46.7%). The most common severe AEs were: arterial hypertension (17 patients, 18.5%), diarrhea (6 patients, 6.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2 patients, 2.2%). The most frequent laboratory abnormalities during therapy were elevated serum transaminases (33 patients, 35.9%), anemia (13 patients, 14.1%), and thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 10.9%). No previously unreported AEs or laboratory abnormalities were observed. There was a significant increase in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.05.9; p=0.046) and overall survival (hazard ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval 1.28.3; p0.025) in patients with treatment-related arterial hypertension. Conclusion. The observational study confirmed the acceptable safety profile of cabozantinib in the first and subsequent lines of treatment in mRCC patients. No new safety signals were identified. Treatment-related arterial hypertension may be a favorable predictor of survival.
卡博赞替尼单药治疗晚期肾细胞癌的安全性和毒性:一项俄罗斯多中心观察性研究
的目标。评估安全性,分析卡博赞替尼单药治疗对未选择的俄罗斯转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者治疗效果的影响。材料和方法。研究纳入了92例经证实的mRCC患者的医疗资料。患者的中位年龄为56岁(1979)岁,其中60岁(65.2%)为男性。25例(27.2%)患者具有东部肿瘤合作组绩效状态(ECOG PS)。在卡博赞替尼单药治疗开始时,根据国际转移性肾癌数据库联盟(IMDC)模型,5例(5.4%)患者预后良好,54例(58.7%)为中间预后,33例(35.9%)为不良预后。83例(90.2%)患者接受了预处理,其中76例(82.6%)患者先前接受过抗血管生成药物治疗。所有患者均给予卡博赞替尼单药治疗(60 mg/天);按说明书进行剂量调整。结果。92例患者中有81例(88.0%)报告不良事件(ae);34级ae 30例(32.6%)。28例(30.4%)患者需要减少卡博赞替尼的毒性相关剂量,15例(16.3%)患者需要中断治疗,2例(2.2%)患者需要停药。最常见的ae是高血压(69例,75.0%)、虚弱(47例,51.1%)、腹泻(43例,46.7%)和掌足底红觉不良(43例,46.7%)。最常见的严重ae是:动脉高血压(17例,18.5%)、腹泻(6例,6.5%)和掌足底红觉不良(2例,2.2%)。治疗期间最常见的实验室异常是血清转氨酶升高(33例,35.9%)、贫血(13例,14.1%)和血小板减少(10例,10.9%)。未观察到先前未报道的ae或实验室异常。无进展生存期显著增加(风险比2.5;95%置信区间1.05.9;P =0.046)和总生存率(风险比3.0;95%置信区间1.28.3;P0.025)。结论。这项观察性研究证实,卡博赞替尼在mRCC患者的一线和后续治疗中具有可接受的安全性。没有发现新的安全信号。治疗相关性动脉高血压可能是一个有利的生存预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Oncology
Journal of Modern Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信