Hersch and Elihu Lauterpacht and the relevance of private law sources for international law: from theory to practice against the background of international law's evolution and the adoption of the Unidroit Principles

IF 0.7 Q4 LAW
A. M. Steingruber
{"title":"Hersch and Elihu Lauterpacht and the relevance of private law sources for international law: from theory to practice against the background of international law's evolution and the adoption of the Unidroit Principles","authors":"A. M. Steingruber","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unab015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Private law sources in international law were a main object of study of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, who is considered one of the greatest international lawyers of the last century. In his time, the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law’s Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) did not exist. The first version of the PICC was only published in 1994, more than three decades after his death. In the year 2000, the disputing parties of an investment treaty arbitration case concluded before a tribunal chaired by his son, Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, a settlement agreement dated 20 March 2000, which would later be embodied in an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Additional Facility arbitral award issued by the tribunal on 18 September 2000, where they incorporated slightly modified PICC provisions. The present article will argue that private law sources are still important in certain areas of international law, such as investment arbitration. In investment arbitration, they are not only important in presence of contracts but they can also arguably be useful for the interpretation of treaties. Investment tribunals have indeed recognized the importance of the PICC for both the interpretation of contracts (transnational agreements) and the interpretation of treaties (international agreements).","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unab015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Private law sources in international law were a main object of study of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, who is considered one of the greatest international lawyers of the last century. In his time, the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law’s Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) did not exist. The first version of the PICC was only published in 1994, more than three decades after his death. In the year 2000, the disputing parties of an investment treaty arbitration case concluded before a tribunal chaired by his son, Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, a settlement agreement dated 20 March 2000, which would later be embodied in an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Additional Facility arbitral award issued by the tribunal on 18 September 2000, where they incorporated slightly modified PICC provisions. The present article will argue that private law sources are still important in certain areas of international law, such as investment arbitration. In investment arbitration, they are not only important in presence of contracts but they can also arguably be useful for the interpretation of treaties. Investment tribunals have indeed recognized the importance of the PICC for both the interpretation of contracts (transnational agreements) and the interpretation of treaties (international agreements).
Hersch和Elihu Lauterpacht与私法渊源对国际法的相关性:从理论到实践——以国际法的演变和统一法理原则的采用为背景
国际法中的私法渊源是赫希·劳特帕赫特爵士的主要研究对象,他被认为是上世纪最伟大的国际律师之一。在他的时代,国际统一国际商事合同私法原则协会(PICC)还不存在。《人保险》第一版直到1994年才出版,此时距他去世已经30多年了。2000年,一宗投资条约仲裁案的争议各方在其儿子劳特帕赫特爵士主持的仲裁庭前达成了一份日期为2000年3月20日的和解协议,该协议后来体现在仲裁庭于2000年9月18日发布的国际投资争端解决中心附加机制仲裁裁裁书中,其中纳入了略为修改的中国人民保险公司条款。本文将论证私法渊源在诸如投资仲裁等国际法的某些领域仍然很重要。在投资仲裁中,它们不仅在存在合同时很重要,而且在解释条约时也可以说是有用的。投资法庭确实认识到中国人民保险公司在解释合同(跨国协议)和解释条约(国际协议)方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书