UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: RESULTS OF THE TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION IMPACT RANKINGS 2022

V. Riabchenko, O. Bulvinska
{"title":"UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: RESULTS OF THE TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION IMPACT RANKINGS 2022","authors":"V. Riabchenko, O. Bulvinska","doi":"10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022, which reflects the activities of universities in ensuring the sustainable development. It is emphasized that the autonomy of universities, along with the possibilities of governance and academic freedom, strengthens their social responsibility for the results of their activities in achieving the goals of sustainable development. One of the mechanisms for evaluating the contribution of universities to ensuring sustainable development is the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings, participation in which is voluntary for higher education institutions. The article analyzes the methodology of the ranking, notes its strengths and gaps. The positive sides of the methodology are openness for universities to be widely involved in the ranking on a voluntary basis, the opportunity for universities to expand their contribution to solving social, political, ecological, economic issues in their country and around the world; certain flexibility of the criteria allows to compare a very diverse environment of higher education institutions. Gaps in the methodology of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings include the optional participation of universities in the ranking, which leads to the absence of most universities in the world, in particular those that are top according to other rankings; a certain imbalance in the weighting factors of the ranking criteria, the impossibility of longitudinal analysis of university achievements. It was emphasized that a statistical study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022 testified to the high achievements of universities from Europe, Australia, and North America, as well as an increase in the ranking of the share of higher education institutions from developing regions.","PeriodicalId":33834,"journal":{"name":"Neperervna profesiina osvita teoriia ta praktika","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neperervna profesiina osvita teoriia ta praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022, which reflects the activities of universities in ensuring the sustainable development. It is emphasized that the autonomy of universities, along with the possibilities of governance and academic freedom, strengthens their social responsibility for the results of their activities in achieving the goals of sustainable development. One of the mechanisms for evaluating the contribution of universities to ensuring sustainable development is the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings, participation in which is voluntary for higher education institutions. The article analyzes the methodology of the ranking, notes its strengths and gaps. The positive sides of the methodology are openness for universities to be widely involved in the ranking on a voluntary basis, the opportunity for universities to expand their contribution to solving social, political, ecological, economic issues in their country and around the world; certain flexibility of the criteria allows to compare a very diverse environment of higher education institutions. Gaps in the methodology of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings include the optional participation of universities in the ranking, which leads to the absence of most universities in the world, in particular those that are top according to other rankings; a certain imbalance in the weighting factors of the ranking criteria, the impossibility of longitudinal analysis of university achievements. It was emphasized that a statistical study of the results of the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2022 testified to the high achievements of universities from Europe, Australia, and North America, as well as an increase in the ranking of the share of higher education institutions from developing regions.
大学自治促进可持续发展:《泰晤士报》2022年高等教育影响力排名结果
本文致力于研究2022年泰晤士报高等教育影响力排名的结果,该排名反映了大学在确保可持续发展方面的活动。它强调,大学的自治,以及治理和学术自由的可能性,加强了它们对实现可持续发展目标的活动结果的社会责任。评估大学对确保可持续发展的贡献的机制之一是泰晤士报高等教育影响力排名,高等教育机构自愿参与该排名。本文分析了排名的方法,指出了它的优势和差距。该方法的积极方面是,大学可以在自愿的基础上广泛参与排名,大学有机会在解决本国和世界各地的社会、政治、生态、经济问题方面做出更大的贡献;标准的一定灵活性允许比较非常多样化的高等教育机构环境。《泰晤士报高等教育影响力排名》方法上的差距包括:大学可选择参与排名,这导致世界上大多数大学缺席,尤其是那些在其他排名中名列前茅的大学;排名标准的权重因素存在一定的不平衡,不可能对大学成绩进行纵向分析。会议强调,对《2022年泰晤士报高等教育影响力排名》结果的统计研究表明,欧洲、澳大利亚和北美的大学取得了很高的成就,发展中地区高等教育机构的排名份额也有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信