INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN FORMATIF BERBASIS HOTS PENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMA (POKOK BAHASAN TEORI KINETIK GAS)

Alvianty Noer Cahya, A. D. Lesmono, M. Maryani
{"title":"INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN FORMATIF BERBASIS HOTS PENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMA (POKOK BAHASAN TEORI KINETIK GAS)","authors":"Alvianty Noer Cahya, A. D. Lesmono, M. Maryani","doi":"10.19184/jpf.v11i3.34321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the validity of the HOTS assessment instrument, the reliability of the HOTS assessment instrument from the test instrument. The test was carried out in class XII MIPA 7 and XII MIPA 8 at SMA Negeri 2 Jember in the even semester. The instrument used in this research is in the form of 20 essay questions on the kinetic theory of gases. This research is a descriptive study using a quantitative approach through ADDIE modeling. The results showed that the average value of the level of validity was 91.11% and the value of the degree of reliability coefficient r11 was 0.9156. The results showed that the results of the analysis of the level of difficulty of the items contained 14 items that were feasible or acceptable and 6 items that were not feasible because they had a level of difficulty that was not in accordance with the criteria for the level of difficulty of the items that were good and the results of the analysis of the distinguishing power of the items, where The results of the analysis show that there are 12 items that are suitable for use with some improvement of questions and 8 items that are not suitable to be used because they have distinguishing power in the bad category or do not match the criteria for good discriminating power. The results showed that students' critical thinking skills in solving physics problems on gas kinetic theory material as measured using the higher order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument could be categorized as moderate.","PeriodicalId":33966,"journal":{"name":"Gravity Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gravity Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v11i3.34321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity of the HOTS assessment instrument, the reliability of the HOTS assessment instrument from the test instrument. The test was carried out in class XII MIPA 7 and XII MIPA 8 at SMA Negeri 2 Jember in the even semester. The instrument used in this research is in the form of 20 essay questions on the kinetic theory of gases. This research is a descriptive study using a quantitative approach through ADDIE modeling. The results showed that the average value of the level of validity was 91.11% and the value of the degree of reliability coefficient r11 was 0.9156. The results showed that the results of the analysis of the level of difficulty of the items contained 14 items that were feasible or acceptable and 6 items that were not feasible because they had a level of difficulty that was not in accordance with the criteria for the level of difficulty of the items that were good and the results of the analysis of the distinguishing power of the items, where The results of the analysis show that there are 12 items that are suitable for use with some improvement of questions and 8 items that are not suitable to be used because they have distinguishing power in the bad category or do not match the criteria for good discriminating power. The results showed that students' critical thinking skills in solving physics problems on gas kinetic theory material as measured using the higher order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument could be categorized as moderate.
基于高中批判性思维量表的形成性评估工具(气体动力学理论主题)
本研究旨在确定HOTS评估工具的效度,从测试工具上确定HOTS评估工具的信度。试验于11月在SMA Negeri 2的XII MIPA 7班和XII MIPA 8班进行。在这项研究中使用的工具是20个关于气体动力学理论的论文问题。本研究采用ADDIE模型,采用定量方法进行描述性研究。结果表明,效度水平均值为91.11%,信度系数r11均值为0.9156。结果表明,题目的难度分析结果中有14个题目是可行或可接受的,有6个题目是不可行的,因为它们的难度水平不符合题目的难度水平和题目的区分能力分析结果的标准。其中,分析结果表明,有12个题目经过一定程度的改进后适合使用,有8个题目因为在差类中具有区分力或不符合良好区分力的标准而不适合使用。结果表明:采用高阶思维技能(HOTS)测试仪器测量的学生在解决气体动力学理论材料物理问题时的批判性思维能力属于中等水平;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信