Effect of Emotional Valence, Frequency and Gender on L2 Word Recognition Time: An Eye Tracking Study

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Davoud Amini, Mahdieh Mamizadeh, K. Pouralvar
{"title":"Effect of Emotional Valence, Frequency and Gender on L2 Word Recognition Time: An Eye Tracking Study","authors":"Davoud Amini, Mahdieh Mamizadeh, K. Pouralvar","doi":"10.52547/lrr.13.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotional words are assumed to have a processing advantage over neutral words due to their emotional content. Meanwhile, this advantage depends on other word features such as frequency and the characteristics of the processor and context of learning. Accordingly, the current study investigated the simultaneous impacts of L2 words‟ emotional valence and frequency, and L2 user‟s gender on word recognition time in a natural reading context. 43 intermediate EFL learners read 36 sentences in a coherent text for comprehension while their eye movements were recorded by eye-tracker. The findings revealed that participants processed the positive, negative, and neutral words identically based on eye fixation time. However, the frequency effect was attained for both valenced and neutral words. Also, no significant gender differences were approved in terms of recognition time though male participants tended to process all word types slightly faster than female ones. The lack of processing difference between valenced and neutral words is attributed to the disembodiment of L2 emotional words and learning experience of the participants as late EFL learners. These learners have been deprived of affective socialization and the affective sensory experience in their development of L2 emotional words. The absence of valence/frequency interaction is attributed to the L1/L2 relationship in terms of the target words. Although witnessed gender effect did not reach a significance level, it is suggested that the processing of emotional words be viewed in a multidimensional framework where the characteristics of the word, the processor, and the learning context are taken into account.","PeriodicalId":53465,"journal":{"name":"Language Related Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Emotional words are assumed to have a processing advantage over neutral words due to their emotional content. Meanwhile, this advantage depends on other word features such as frequency and the characteristics of the processor and context of learning. Accordingly, the current study investigated the simultaneous impacts of L2 words‟ emotional valence and frequency, and L2 user‟s gender on word recognition time in a natural reading context. 43 intermediate EFL learners read 36 sentences in a coherent text for comprehension while their eye movements were recorded by eye-tracker. The findings revealed that participants processed the positive, negative, and neutral words identically based on eye fixation time. However, the frequency effect was attained for both valenced and neutral words. Also, no significant gender differences were approved in terms of recognition time though male participants tended to process all word types slightly faster than female ones. The lack of processing difference between valenced and neutral words is attributed to the disembodiment of L2 emotional words and learning experience of the participants as late EFL learners. These learners have been deprived of affective socialization and the affective sensory experience in their development of L2 emotional words. The absence of valence/frequency interaction is attributed to the L1/L2 relationship in terms of the target words. Although witnessed gender effect did not reach a significance level, it is suggested that the processing of emotional words be viewed in a multidimensional framework where the characteristics of the word, the processor, and the learning context are taken into account.
情绪效价、频率和性别对二语单词识别时间的影响:眼动追踪研究
情绪性词汇由于其情绪性内容被认为比中性词汇具有加工优势。同时,这种优势还取决于其他词的特征,如频率和处理器的特征以及学习的背景。因此,本研究考察了在自然阅读情境下,二语词汇的情绪效价和频率以及二语使用者的性别对词汇识别时间的同时影响。43名中级英语学习者在阅读一篇连贯的文章中的36个句子进行理解时,用眼动仪记录他们的眼球运动。研究结果显示,参与者对积极、消极和中性词汇的处理基于注视时间的相同。而效价词和中性词均存在频率效应。此外,在识别时间方面,尽管男性参与者倾向于比女性参与者更快地处理所有类型的单词,但性别差异并不显著。效价词和中性词加工差异的缺失与二语情绪词的分离和参与者作为后期学习者的学习经历有关。这些学习者在二语情感词汇的发展过程中缺乏情感社会化和情感感官体验。价/频相互作用的缺失归因于目标词的L1/L2关系。虽然目击性别效应没有达到显著性水平,但我们建议在一个多维的框架中看待情感词的加工,其中考虑了词的特征、处理者的特征和学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Related Research
Language Related Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language Related Research is a platform to develop scientific thought in the specific fields of language sciences, enunciation and discourse. Accordingly, Language Related Research journal welcomes the original articles with theoretical, analytical and field work backgrounds. The Journal highly recommends the scholars avoid clichés and tautology with special focus on the diversity in the field of theorizing and applied background of language, corpus based studies and reference to the main domestic and international research. In the own field of theorizing and mindfulness however, issue-driven analysis based on original hypothesis, field works with quantitative and applied domain have the scientific priority for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信