Is the Cemetery Dead? by David Charles Sloane (review)

Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/bdl.2022.0005
L. Douglas
{"title":"Is the Cemetery Dead? by David Charles Sloane (review)","authors":"L. Douglas","doi":"10.1353/bdl.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"study of the ethnic houses of south St. Louis), and more specific examples would contribute further to our understanding of the forces, structures, and personalities that effected the transformation at the center of the book. Remodeling and adaptive reuse, multifamily dwellings, rental housing, and boarding are included in this account, but still remain on the periphery of the study. More work needs to be done on these aspects of the workingclass home, especially the experiences of the boarders. The total focus on the question of class— and the limited analysis of the issues of race, public housing, and factory towns within this examination— needs further attention. As the author himself acknowledges, the study neglects whole regions of the United States, particularly the South and Texas, weakening the national claims so central to his thesis. These will be issues to be taken up by future scholars. Studies that pick up the work Hubka has done could also enlarge the scope of the field research by using digital sources and data scraping, including fire insurance maps, newspapers, water and sewer records, and even nomination forms. The field of digital humanities is one which vernacularists, focused on mass production and largescale studies, should investigate. This thoughtprovoking book challenges received wisdom in several fields and provides an important foundation for further, more nuanced investigation of the intertwined relationships of everyday houses, people, material goods, and technology during this transformational period. It not only does yeoman’s work in addressing an important and understudied field in the histories of housing and domestic architecture, but it also raises larger issues in the field of vernacular studies and architectural history, bringing them into relation with each other, drawing from the best of both. AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY Paula Lupkin is an associate professor of art and design history at the University of North Texas. Her research explores the interactions between capital flows, technology, and building cultures in the early twentieth century. Recent publications include “The Telegraphic Interior: Networking Space for Capital Flows in the 1920s” (2020) and “Standard Vernacular: Processes and Practices Beyond the Plan Factory” (2018).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bdl.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

study of the ethnic houses of south St. Louis), and more specific examples would contribute further to our understanding of the forces, structures, and personalities that effected the transformation at the center of the book. Remodeling and adaptive reuse, multifamily dwellings, rental housing, and boarding are included in this account, but still remain on the periphery of the study. More work needs to be done on these aspects of the workingclass home, especially the experiences of the boarders. The total focus on the question of class— and the limited analysis of the issues of race, public housing, and factory towns within this examination— needs further attention. As the author himself acknowledges, the study neglects whole regions of the United States, particularly the South and Texas, weakening the national claims so central to his thesis. These will be issues to be taken up by future scholars. Studies that pick up the work Hubka has done could also enlarge the scope of the field research by using digital sources and data scraping, including fire insurance maps, newspapers, water and sewer records, and even nomination forms. The field of digital humanities is one which vernacularists, focused on mass production and largescale studies, should investigate. This thoughtprovoking book challenges received wisdom in several fields and provides an important foundation for further, more nuanced investigation of the intertwined relationships of everyday houses, people, material goods, and technology during this transformational period. It not only does yeoman’s work in addressing an important and understudied field in the histories of housing and domestic architecture, but it also raises larger issues in the field of vernacular studies and architectural history, bringing them into relation with each other, drawing from the best of both. AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY Paula Lupkin is an associate professor of art and design history at the University of North Texas. Her research explores the interactions between capital flows, technology, and building cultures in the early twentieth century. Recent publications include “The Telegraphic Interior: Networking Space for Capital Flows in the 1920s” (2020) and “Standard Vernacular: Processes and Practices Beyond the Plan Factory” (2018).
分享
查看原文
墓地死了吗?作者:大卫·查尔斯·斯隆(书评)
南圣路易斯少数民族住宅的研究),以及更具体的例子将有助于我们进一步理解影响本书中心转变的力量、结构和个性。改造和适应性再利用、多户住宅、租赁住房和寄宿都包括在这个账户中,但仍然是研究的外围。工人阶级家庭的这些方面需要做更多的工作,特别是寄宿生的经历。在这次考试中,对阶级问题的全部关注——以及对种族、公共住房和工厂城镇问题的有限分析——需要进一步注意。正如作者自己承认的那样,这项研究忽略了美国的整个地区,尤其是南部和德克萨斯州,削弱了他的论文中如此重要的国家主张。这些问题将由未来的学者来研究。继承Hubka所做的工作的研究还可以通过使用数字资源和数据抓取来扩大实地研究的范围,包括火灾保险地图、报纸、水和下水道记录,甚至提名表格。数字人文领域是关注大规模生产和大规模研究的白话文学者应该研究的领域。这本发人深省的书在几个领域挑战了公认的智慧,并为进一步、更细致地研究这个转型时期日常房屋、人、物质商品和技术之间错综复杂的关系提供了重要的基础。它不仅解决了约曼在住房和国内建筑史上一个重要而未被充分研究的领域的工作,而且还提出了本土研究和建筑史领域的更大问题,将它们相互联系起来,从两者中汲取精华。作者简介Paula Lupkin是北德克萨斯大学艺术与设计史副教授。她的研究探讨了20世纪初资本流动、技术和建筑文化之间的相互作用。最近的出版物包括《电报内部:20世纪20年代资本流动的网络空间》(2020年)和《标准白话:计划工厂之外的过程和实践》(2018年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信