Gas Flare Design Debottlenecking Using Pinch Analysis

Lawrence Leelabari Pemii, K. Dagde, T. O. Goodhead
{"title":"Gas Flare Design Debottlenecking Using Pinch Analysis","authors":"Lawrence Leelabari Pemii, K. Dagde, T. O. Goodhead","doi":"10.4236/aces.2020.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gas flaring is concerned with the combustion of lighter ends of \nhydrocarbon mostly produced in association with crude oil. Flare networks are \ndesigned to handle the gas volume required to be flared. Most times, this flare \nnetworks are in close proximity but still have independent flare stacks, increasing \nrisk to environment and cost on infrastructures. There is a need to integrate \nthe flare networks in facilities within same area and through the application \nof Pinch Analysis concept, the resultant flare network can be optimized to give \na system having optimal tail and header pipe sizes that will reduce cost and \nimpact on environment. In the light of the \nforegoing, the concept of pinch analysis \nwas used in debottlenecking integrated gas flare networks from a flow \nstation and a refinery in close proximity. Both flare networks were integrated \nand the resultant gas flare network was optimized to obtain the optimum pipe \nheader and tail pipe sizes with the capacity to withstand the inventory from \nboth facilities and satisfy the set constraints such as Mach number, noise, \nRhoV2 and backpressure. Mach number was set at 0.7 for tail pipes \nand 0.5 for header pipes, noise limit was not to exceed 80 dB upstream and 115 dB \ndownstream the sources, RhoV2 was limited to 6000 kg/m/s2 and the back pressure requirement was source \ndependent respectively. The fire case scenario was considered, as it is the \nworst-case scenario in the studies. When pinch analysis was applied in \ndebottlenecking the combined gas flare network, it gave smaller tail and header pipe sizes which is more economical. A 20% \ndecrease in pipe sizes was recorded at the end of the study.","PeriodicalId":7332,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2020.104019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gas flaring is concerned with the combustion of lighter ends of hydrocarbon mostly produced in association with crude oil. Flare networks are designed to handle the gas volume required to be flared. Most times, this flare networks are in close proximity but still have independent flare stacks, increasing risk to environment and cost on infrastructures. There is a need to integrate the flare networks in facilities within same area and through the application of Pinch Analysis concept, the resultant flare network can be optimized to give a system having optimal tail and header pipe sizes that will reduce cost and impact on environment. In the light of the foregoing, the concept of pinch analysis was used in debottlenecking integrated gas flare networks from a flow station and a refinery in close proximity. Both flare networks were integrated and the resultant gas flare network was optimized to obtain the optimum pipe header and tail pipe sizes with the capacity to withstand the inventory from both facilities and satisfy the set constraints such as Mach number, noise, RhoV2 and backpressure. Mach number was set at 0.7 for tail pipes and 0.5 for header pipes, noise limit was not to exceed 80 dB upstream and 115 dB downstream the sources, RhoV2 was limited to 6000 kg/m/s2 and the back pressure requirement was source dependent respectively. The fire case scenario was considered, as it is the worst-case scenario in the studies. When pinch analysis was applied in debottlenecking the combined gas flare network, it gave smaller tail and header pipe sizes which is more economical. A 20% decrease in pipe sizes was recorded at the end of the study.
气火炬设计与掐点分析
天然气燃除主要是燃烧与原油伴生的碳氢化合物的较轻末端。火炬网络的设计是为了处理需要燃烧的天然气量。大多数情况下,这些火炬网络距离很近,但仍然有独立的火炬堆栈,这增加了环境风险和基础设施成本。需要在同一区域内的设施中整合火炬网络,通过应用Pinch Analysis概念,可以优化最终的火炬网络,以提供具有最佳尾管和集管尺寸的系统,从而降低成本和对环境的影响。综上所述,掐点分析的概念被用于从靠近的一个流站和一个炼油厂的集成天然气火炬网络的去瓶颈。对两个火炬网络进行了集成,并对生成的天然气火炬网络进行了优化,以获得最优的总管和尾管尺寸,能够承受来自两个设施的库存,并满足马赫数、噪声、RhoV2和背压等设定约束。尾管马赫数为0.7,总管马赫数为0.5,噪声源上游不超过80 dB,下游不超过115 dB, RhoV2限制为6000 kg/m/s2,背压要求分别与噪声源相关。考虑了火灾情况,因为它是研究中最坏的情况。将夹紧分析应用于天然气联合火炬网络去瓶颈时,得到了更小的尾管和总管尺寸,更经济。在研究结束时,管道尺寸减小了20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信