Framework for ethical and acceptable use of social distancing tools and smart devices during COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe

Elliot Mbunge , Richard C Millham , Maureen Nokuthula Sibiya , Stephen G Fashoto , Boluwaji Akinnuwesi , Sakhile Simelane , Nzuza Ndumiso
{"title":"Framework for ethical and acceptable use of social distancing tools and smart devices during COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe","authors":"Elliot Mbunge ,&nbsp;Richard C Millham ,&nbsp;Maureen Nokuthula Sibiya ,&nbsp;Stephen G Fashoto ,&nbsp;Boluwaji Akinnuwesi ,&nbsp;Sakhile Simelane ,&nbsp;Nzuza Ndumiso","doi":"10.1016/j.susoc.2021.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the successful development of vaccines, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to present unprecedented challenges. Besides the ongoing vaccination activities, many countries still rely on measures including social distancing, contact tracing, mandatory face masking among others. Several digital technologies such as smart devices, social distancing tools, smart applications have been adopted to enhance public adherence to reduce secondary transmission. Such technologies use health data, symptoms monitoring, mobility, location and proximity data for contact tracing, self-isolation and quarantine compliance. The use of digital technologies has been debatable and contentious because of the potential violation of ethical values such as security and privacy, data format and management, synchronization, over-tracking, over-surveillance and lack of proper development and implementation guidelines which subsequently impact their efficacy and adoption. Also, the aggressive and mandatory use of large-scale digital technologies is not easy to implement, adhere to and subsequently difficult to practice which ultimately lead to imperfect public compliance. To alleviate these impediments, we analysed the available literature and propose an ethical framework for the use of digital technologies centred on ethical practices. The proposed framework highlights the trade-offs, potential roles and coordination of different stakeholders involved in the development and implementation of digital technologies, from various social and political contexts in Zimbabwe. We suggest that transparency, regular engagement and participation of potential users are likely to boost public trust. However, the potential violation of ethical values, poor communication, hasty implementation of digital technologies will likely undermine public trust, and as such, risk their adoption and efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101201,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.07.003","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412721000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Despite the successful development of vaccines, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to present unprecedented challenges. Besides the ongoing vaccination activities, many countries still rely on measures including social distancing, contact tracing, mandatory face masking among others. Several digital technologies such as smart devices, social distancing tools, smart applications have been adopted to enhance public adherence to reduce secondary transmission. Such technologies use health data, symptoms monitoring, mobility, location and proximity data for contact tracing, self-isolation and quarantine compliance. The use of digital technologies has been debatable and contentious because of the potential violation of ethical values such as security and privacy, data format and management, synchronization, over-tracking, over-surveillance and lack of proper development and implementation guidelines which subsequently impact their efficacy and adoption. Also, the aggressive and mandatory use of large-scale digital technologies is not easy to implement, adhere to and subsequently difficult to practice which ultimately lead to imperfect public compliance. To alleviate these impediments, we analysed the available literature and propose an ethical framework for the use of digital technologies centred on ethical practices. The proposed framework highlights the trade-offs, potential roles and coordination of different stakeholders involved in the development and implementation of digital technologies, from various social and political contexts in Zimbabwe. We suggest that transparency, regular engagement and participation of potential users are likely to boost public trust. However, the potential violation of ethical values, poor communication, hasty implementation of digital technologies will likely undermine public trust, and as such, risk their adoption and efficacy.

在津巴布韦COVID-19大流行期间道德和可接受地使用社交距离工具和智能设备的框架
尽管疫苗开发取得成功,但冠状病毒病(COVID-19)继续带来前所未有的挑战。除了正在进行的疫苗接种活动外,许多国家仍然依赖社会距离、接触者追踪、强制性口罩等措施。采用了一些数字技术,如智能设备、社交距离工具和智能应用程序,以加强公众依从性,减少二次传播。这些技术使用健康数据、症状监测、流动性、位置和邻近数据来追踪接触者、自我隔离和遵守隔离规定。数字技术的使用一直存在争议和争议,因为它可能违反道德价值观,如安全和隐私、数据格式和管理、同步、过度跟踪、过度监视以及缺乏适当的开发和实施指南,从而影响其有效性和采用。此外,大规模数字技术的积极和强制性使用不容易实施,坚持和随后难以实践,最终导致公众遵守的不完善。为了减轻这些障碍,我们分析了现有的文献,并提出了一个以道德实践为中心的数字技术使用的道德框架。拟议的框架强调了来自津巴布韦各种社会和政治背景的参与数字技术开发和实施的不同利益攸关方的权衡、潜在作用和协调。我们认为,透明度、潜在用户的定期参与和参与可能会提高公众的信任。然而,潜在的违反道德价值观、沟通不畅、仓促实施数字技术可能会破坏公众的信任,从而危及数字技术的采用和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信