Orwell’s 1984 in Pekić’s 1999: Intertextual Relations

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Maja Sekulović
{"title":"Orwell’s 1984 in Pekić’s 1999: Intertextual Relations","authors":"Maja Sekulović","doi":"10.3986/pkn.v42.i3.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines intertextual relations between two dystopian novels – Borislav Pekic’s anthropological account entitled 1999 and George Orwell’s 1984. In postmodernism, the literary movement which Pekic’s oeuvre belongs to in terms of poetic principles, intertextual dialogue is very active and dominant. I argue that Orwell’s novel serves as a proto-text or an inspiration for Pekic in constructing his own narrative. This is particularly reflected in the conceptual organization of key elements of the narrative structure such as chronotope and characters. The dominant spatial structure taken over from Orwell is the Golden Country, a pasture where all important events in the novel take place. Similarly, the prominent temporal determinant, i.e. the year 1999, becomes a symbol just as it is the case with 1984. As regards the constructs of the plot, i.e. the characters, it is proposed that Pekic’s Arno and the mole emerge as counterparts to Orwell’s Winston and O’Brien. The chronotope of meeting, along with the resonant sentences “We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness” and “We shall meet when flowers bloom again,” is a constant in both narrative structures. Regarding personality traits, Pekic’s last man in the world, i.e. Arno, is well-matched with Winston, Orwell’s last man. Both are modelled as aloof, lonely in their lives and ideas, and as individuals juxtaposed with the group. Furthermore, Pekic treats the motifs of love, history and rats similarly to the way Orwell does. Love fails to ensure the survival of humankind, historical facts are misrepresented, while the motif of rats metaphorically represents danger inboth texts.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/pkn.v42.i3.14","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines intertextual relations between two dystopian novels – Borislav Pekic’s anthropological account entitled 1999 and George Orwell’s 1984. In postmodernism, the literary movement which Pekic’s oeuvre belongs to in terms of poetic principles, intertextual dialogue is very active and dominant. I argue that Orwell’s novel serves as a proto-text or an inspiration for Pekic in constructing his own narrative. This is particularly reflected in the conceptual organization of key elements of the narrative structure such as chronotope and characters. The dominant spatial structure taken over from Orwell is the Golden Country, a pasture where all important events in the novel take place. Similarly, the prominent temporal determinant, i.e. the year 1999, becomes a symbol just as it is the case with 1984. As regards the constructs of the plot, i.e. the characters, it is proposed that Pekic’s Arno and the mole emerge as counterparts to Orwell’s Winston and O’Brien. The chronotope of meeting, along with the resonant sentences “We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness” and “We shall meet when flowers bloom again,” is a constant in both narrative structures. Regarding personality traits, Pekic’s last man in the world, i.e. Arno, is well-matched with Winston, Orwell’s last man. Both are modelled as aloof, lonely in their lives and ideas, and as individuals juxtaposed with the group. Furthermore, Pekic treats the motifs of love, history and rats similarly to the way Orwell does. Love fails to ensure the survival of humankind, historical facts are misrepresented, while the motif of rats metaphorically represents danger inboth texts.
奥威尔的《1984》和佩基奇的《1999:互文关系》
本文考察了两部反乌托邦小说——鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇的人类学著作《1999》和乔治·奥威尔的《1984》之间的互文关系。在后现代主义中,裴契奇的作品在诗歌原则上属于文学运动,互文对话是非常活跃和占主导地位的。我认为奥威尔的小说是Pekic构建自己叙事的原型或灵感来源。这一点尤其体现在叙事结构关键元素的概念组织上,比如时间轴和人物。从奥威尔那里继承下来的主要空间结构是黄金之乡,小说中所有重要事件都发生在这里。同样,突出的时间决定因素,即1999年,就像1984年的情况一样,成为一个符号。关于情节结构,即人物,建议Pekic的Arno和mole作为Orwell的Winston和O 'Brien的对应物出现。“我们将在没有黑暗的地方相遇”和“我们将在花朵再次绽放的时候相遇”这两种叙事结构中都是不变的。在性格特征上,Pekic笔下的最后一个男人Arno与奥威尔笔下的最后一个男人Winston非常匹配。两人在生活和思想上都表现得冷漠、孤独,个人与群体并置。此外,Pekic对待爱情、历史和老鼠的方式与奥威尔相似。爱情不能保证人类的生存,历史事实被歪曲,老鼠的母题在两个文本中都隐喻着危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信