Guthrie Joint Camp: Improved Care At Lower Cost

C. Pogge
{"title":"Guthrie Joint Camp: Improved Care At Lower Cost","authors":"C. Pogge","doi":"10.3138/guthrie.70.3.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Problem: Review of operative procedures within the Guthrie Healthcare System revealed that major joint replacement (DRG 209) was not only decreasing in volume but becoming more expensive. The Goal: To review all aspects of care of patients needing major joint replacement for potenti al opportunities to streamline the experience while increasing quality, decreasing cost, and increasing patient satisfaction. The Solution/Results: To begin the review process, all physician staff, nursing and allied health staff and administration involved in any way in the care of patients needing joint replacement were stimulated to participate in a review of the current practices at Robert Packer Hospital and to compare them to best practices throughout the country. The Musculoskeletal Service Line Leader organized these efforts and initiated the review of DRG 209. As a result of this intense review, practice changes were determined and established using a multidisciplinary approach. It was through everyone's review of their portion of the DRG and a complete restructuring of the DRG 209 process that ‘Joint Camp’ evolved. Its premise is that joint replacement patients are not sick; therefore, a wellness approach was utilized. Initially, physicians eva luated their surgical practice. Through vendor negotiations, supply variances were eliminated and the organization was able to obtain significant cost savings. Next, the patient experience was changed through the use of a ‘coach,’ who helped the patient with rehabilitation during the hospital stay and after discharge. Also, a community setting was utilized for their reh abilitation process. This supportive, yet competitive environment increased their mobility at a faster rate than previously experienced, thus resulting in enhanced outcomes, a decreased length of stay, and a patient satisfaction score in the 99th percentile. Our case numbers have continued to increase, our patient satisfaction scores are continuously in the 99th percentile, the DRG has become profitable, and the quality has been enhanced through the use of the ‘coach.’ This successful Joint Camp program has now been started in Corning Hospital.","PeriodicalId":83043,"journal":{"name":"The Guthrie journal of the Donald Guthrie Foundation for Medical Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Guthrie journal of the Donald Guthrie Foundation for Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/guthrie.70.3.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Problem: Review of operative procedures within the Guthrie Healthcare System revealed that major joint replacement (DRG 209) was not only decreasing in volume but becoming more expensive. The Goal: To review all aspects of care of patients needing major joint replacement for potenti al opportunities to streamline the experience while increasing quality, decreasing cost, and increasing patient satisfaction. The Solution/Results: To begin the review process, all physician staff, nursing and allied health staff and administration involved in any way in the care of patients needing joint replacement were stimulated to participate in a review of the current practices at Robert Packer Hospital and to compare them to best practices throughout the country. The Musculoskeletal Service Line Leader organized these efforts and initiated the review of DRG 209. As a result of this intense review, practice changes were determined and established using a multidisciplinary approach. It was through everyone's review of their portion of the DRG and a complete restructuring of the DRG 209 process that ‘Joint Camp’ evolved. Its premise is that joint replacement patients are not sick; therefore, a wellness approach was utilized. Initially, physicians eva luated their surgical practice. Through vendor negotiations, supply variances were eliminated and the organization was able to obtain significant cost savings. Next, the patient experience was changed through the use of a ‘coach,’ who helped the patient with rehabilitation during the hospital stay and after discharge. Also, a community setting was utilized for their reh abilitation process. This supportive, yet competitive environment increased their mobility at a faster rate than previously experienced, thus resulting in enhanced outcomes, a decreased length of stay, and a patient satisfaction score in the 99th percentile. Our case numbers have continued to increase, our patient satisfaction scores are continuously in the 99th percentile, the DRG has become profitable, and the quality has been enhanced through the use of the ‘coach.’ This successful Joint Camp program has now been started in Corning Hospital.
格思里联合营地:以更低的成本改善护理
问题:对Guthrie医疗保健系统内手术程序的回顾显示,主要关节置换术(DRG 209)不仅数量减少,而且变得更加昂贵。目的:回顾需要大关节置换术的患者护理的所有方面,寻找潜在的机会,在提高质量、降低成本和提高患者满意度的同时简化体验。解决方案/结果:在开始审查过程时,鼓励所有参与关节置换患者护理的医生、护理人员和专职卫生人员以及行政管理人员参与对罗伯特·帕克医院当前做法的审查,并将其与全国最佳做法进行比较。肌肉骨骼服务部门负责人组织了这些工作,并启动了DRG 209的审查。由于这种密集的审查,实践的变化是确定和建立使用多学科的方法。正是通过每个人对他们的DRG部分的审查和对DRG 209过程的彻底重组,“联合营地”才得以发展。它的前提是关节置换患者没有生病;因此,采用了一种健康的方法。最初,医生评估他们的手术实践。通过供应商谈判,消除了供应差异,组织能够获得显著的成本节约。接下来,通过使用“教练”来改变患者的体验,教练在住院期间和出院后帮助患者进行康复。此外,他们的康复过程还利用了社区环境。这种支持性的竞争环境比以前更快地提高了他们的流动性,从而提高了结果,缩短了住院时间,患者满意度得分达到了99个百分位数。我们的病例数持续增加,我们的患者满意度得分持续保持在第99百分位,DRG已经盈利,并且通过使用“教练”提高了质量。这个成功的联合营项目现在已经在康宁医院开始了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书