A Qualitative Study of How Hospice Workers Cope With Their Level of Exposure to Death.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alex Sielaff, Lyla Rothschild, Dylan E Horner, Jeff Greenberg
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of How Hospice Workers Cope With Their Level of Exposure to Death.","authors":"Alex Sielaff, Lyla Rothschild, Dylan E Horner, Jeff Greenberg","doi":"10.1177/00302228231184297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether hospice workers hold unique and theoretically-informative perspectives about death, especially as they relate to terror management processes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve hospice workers from two hospices in Tucson, Arizona, United States, participated in semi-structured interviews. Interview and analytic practices were guided by Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three categories were identified in relation to death attitudes: effects of chronic confrontation with death; reasons for working in hospice; and perceptions of death in others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two theoretically informative trends appeared. First, hospice workers largely manage death anxiety as identified by existing literature with the notable exception that hospice workers overall seem to integrate death and dying into their worldviews as a meaningful category, as opposed to avoiding thinking about death. Second, even among those regularly exposed to death, there seems to be a range across participants on a continuum from avoiding to confronting the topic of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":47794,"journal":{"name":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228231184297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify whether hospice workers hold unique and theoretically-informative perspectives about death, especially as they relate to terror management processes.

Method: Twelve hospice workers from two hospices in Tucson, Arizona, United States, participated in semi-structured interviews. Interview and analytic practices were guided by Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967).

Results: Three categories were identified in relation to death attitudes: effects of chronic confrontation with death; reasons for working in hospice; and perceptions of death in others.

Conclusions: Two theoretically informative trends appeared. First, hospice workers largely manage death anxiety as identified by existing literature with the notable exception that hospice workers overall seem to integrate death and dying into their worldviews as a meaningful category, as opposed to avoiding thinking about death. Second, even among those regularly exposed to death, there seems to be a range across participants on a continuum from avoiding to confronting the topic of death.

关于临终关怀工作者如何应对死亡的定性研究。
目的确定安宁疗护工作者是否对死亡持有独特的、理论上有启发性的观点,尤其是与恐怖管理过程相关的观点:来自美国亚利桑那州图森市两家临终关怀机构的 12 名临终关怀工作者参加了半结构化访谈。访谈和分析实践以基础理论(Glaser & Strauss,1967 年)为指导:结果:确定了与死亡态度有关的三个类别:长期面对死亡的影响;在临终关怀机构工作的原因;以及对他人死亡的看法:结论:出现了两个具有理论意义的趋势。首先,安宁疗护工作者在很大程度上控制了现有文献所指出的死亡焦虑,但有一个明显的例外,即安宁疗护工作者总体上似乎将死亡和垂死作为一个有意义的范畴纳入了他们的世界观,而不是回避思考死亡。其次,即使在那些经常接触死亡的人中,参与者似乎也存在着从回避到直面死亡话题的一系列问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
259
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信