Micro-computed tomographic analysis of filling porosity of two different obturation techniques

Amal A. Almohaimede, M. Almutairi, HayaM Alyousef, Ebtissam Almadi
{"title":"Micro-computed tomographic analysis of filling porosity of two different obturation techniques","authors":"Amal A. Almohaimede, M. Almutairi, HayaM Alyousef, Ebtissam Almadi","doi":"10.4103/SJOS.SJORALSCI_43_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The ideal root filling material should have inert properties, good adhesive ability, and result in void-free obturation along the root canals. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the quality of two root canal obturation techniques; cold lateral (CL) condensation and continuous wave (CW) condensation, through measuring the volume of gaps and voids by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods: Forty-extracted teeth with single canal were instrumented with profile rotary files, and divided into two groups as follows: CL condensation (n = 20), and CW obturation (n = 20). The teeth in each obturation group were scanned twice using micro-CT scan. The resultant images were rendered in proprietary software (NRecon version 1.6.9.4) to obtain three-dimensional (3D) pre- and post-obturation records of each specimen. The 3D images were imported into CT Analyser version 1.17.7.2 for volume measurement of voids and gaps in the apical third at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm. The analysis of variance test was used to compare the mean volume of voids and gaps between the two obturation groups in each level in the apical third (1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm). Furthermore, it was used to compare the mean volume of voids and gaps between the three different levels apically in each obturation technique. Results: CW obturation technique had more voids volume at the three different apical levels (1 mm: 0.19 ± 0.16, 3 mm: 0.76 ± 0.81, and 5 mm: 1.36 ± 1.44) compared to CL condensation technique at the same three levels (1 mm: 0.14 ± 0.21, 3 mm: 0.46 ± 0.46, and 5 mm: 1.10 ± 0.93) with no statistical significant difference between them (P < 0.05). Conclusions: None of the root canals filled teeth were voids-free, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two obturation techniques regarding the gaps volume apically.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"8 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/SJOS.SJORALSCI_43_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The ideal root filling material should have inert properties, good adhesive ability, and result in void-free obturation along the root canals. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the quality of two root canal obturation techniques; cold lateral (CL) condensation and continuous wave (CW) condensation, through measuring the volume of gaps and voids by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods: Forty-extracted teeth with single canal were instrumented with profile rotary files, and divided into two groups as follows: CL condensation (n = 20), and CW obturation (n = 20). The teeth in each obturation group were scanned twice using micro-CT scan. The resultant images were rendered in proprietary software (NRecon version 1.6.9.4) to obtain three-dimensional (3D) pre- and post-obturation records of each specimen. The 3D images were imported into CT Analyser version 1.17.7.2 for volume measurement of voids and gaps in the apical third at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm. The analysis of variance test was used to compare the mean volume of voids and gaps between the two obturation groups in each level in the apical third (1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm). Furthermore, it was used to compare the mean volume of voids and gaps between the three different levels apically in each obturation technique. Results: CW obturation technique had more voids volume at the three different apical levels (1 mm: 0.19 ± 0.16, 3 mm: 0.76 ± 0.81, and 5 mm: 1.36 ± 1.44) compared to CL condensation technique at the same three levels (1 mm: 0.14 ± 0.21, 3 mm: 0.46 ± 0.46, and 5 mm: 1.10 ± 0.93) with no statistical significant difference between them (P < 0.05). Conclusions: None of the root canals filled teeth were voids-free, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two obturation techniques regarding the gaps volume apically.
两种不同充填方法充填孔隙度的显微计算机层析分析
理想的根管充填材料应具有惰性、粘连性好、沿根管无空隙封闭等特点。这项体外研究的目的是比较两种根管封闭技术的质量;冷侧向(CL)凝结和连续波(CW)凝结,通过使用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)测量间隙和空隙的体积。材料与方法:将40颗拔除的单根管牙齿用侧廓旋转锉固定,分为两组:CL封闭组(n = 20)和CW封闭组(n = 20)。每个封闭组用micro-CT扫描2次。在专有软件(NRecon version 1.6.9.4)中绘制所得图像,获得每个标本闭孔前后的三维(3D)记录。将三维图像导入CT Analyser version 1.17.7.2,对1 mm、3 mm和5 mm的根尖三分之一处的空隙和间隙进行体积测量。采用方差分析检验比较两组在根尖三分之一节(1 mm、3 mm和5 mm)各水平上的空隙和间隙的平均体积。此外,它被用来比较在每个封闭技术的三个不同水平的顶端的空隙和间隙的平均体积。结果:连续波封堵术在根尖3个不同水平(1 mm: 0.19±0.16,3 mm: 0.76±0.81,5 mm: 1.36±1.44)的空隙量高于CL封闭术在根尖3个水平(1 mm: 0.14±0.21,3 mm: 0.46±0.46,5 mm: 1.10±0.93)的空隙量,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:根管充填后的牙均无空隙,两种充填方式的牙尖空隙量差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信