The Simultaneous Genesis of Monotheism and Scepticism in the Jewish Religion

Aryeh Botwinick
{"title":"The Simultaneous Genesis of Monotheism and Scepticism in the Jewish Religion","authors":"Aryeh Botwinick","doi":"10.1515/9783110618839-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will argue that the conceptual dichotomy between religion and scepticism cannot adequately capture what biblical monotheism inaugurated in the world. In a number of key respects that I will attempt to analytically plot, I will aim to show that Jewish scepticism and its cultural correlative of secularism are co-extensive with Jewish monotheism. I will try to plot the general outlines of an argument that will support the claim that both Western monotheism and Western scepticism have their roots in negative theology. What I will attempt to show is that the logical impediments that block a fully coherent statement of the tenets of both negative theology and scepticism point to a common origin and a common destiny for both doctrines. The traditional narrative of Western religion and its relationship to Western scepticism needs to be radically revised. The traditional story is both structured around and invoked to lend support to the idea of irreconcilable conflict between religion and sceptical modes of thought. The conflicts between religion and scepticism are taken to apply both to the substantive doctrines and to the methodologies of argument of religious and sceptical discourse. With negative theology (the idea that we can only say what God is not, but not what He is) as our organising perspective, we can argue that the areas of continuity and overlap between religion and scepticism are much more prominent and decisive than the areas of tension and discontinuity. The practice of religion is in no way threatened or undermined by this realisation. If anything, it is strengthened and reinforced by it. Where the vista of distance between the human community and God is as steadily maintained as it is by negative theology, the prospect of our succumbing to idolatry and worshipping our own handiwork is considerably diminished. My argument is formulated as a kind of thought experiment. Working with the Maimonidean assumptions in Sefer Ha-Madaʿ and The Guide of the Perplexed (including the annexation of God as a necessary First Cause in the genealogy of monotheism and the historical assumption that the patriarch Abraham was the discoverer of the monotheistic principle), what relationship emerges between monotheism and scepticism? The implicit conception of the relationship between religion and scepticism derivable from negative theology is a function of the central place that Platonic and Neoplatonic arguments occupy in its arsenal. Throughout this paper, I am using the term “scepticism” to refer to the philosophical doctrine that states that words are underdetermined by things; that no item in the “furniture” of the world or the human psyche can be framed in only one way, but that openness and flexibility always prevail with regard to designating the identity of things.","PeriodicalId":93772,"journal":{"name":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I will argue that the conceptual dichotomy between religion and scepticism cannot adequately capture what biblical monotheism inaugurated in the world. In a number of key respects that I will attempt to analytically plot, I will aim to show that Jewish scepticism and its cultural correlative of secularism are co-extensive with Jewish monotheism. I will try to plot the general outlines of an argument that will support the claim that both Western monotheism and Western scepticism have their roots in negative theology. What I will attempt to show is that the logical impediments that block a fully coherent statement of the tenets of both negative theology and scepticism point to a common origin and a common destiny for both doctrines. The traditional narrative of Western religion and its relationship to Western scepticism needs to be radically revised. The traditional story is both structured around and invoked to lend support to the idea of irreconcilable conflict between religion and sceptical modes of thought. The conflicts between religion and scepticism are taken to apply both to the substantive doctrines and to the methodologies of argument of religious and sceptical discourse. With negative theology (the idea that we can only say what God is not, but not what He is) as our organising perspective, we can argue that the areas of continuity and overlap between religion and scepticism are much more prominent and decisive than the areas of tension and discontinuity. The practice of religion is in no way threatened or undermined by this realisation. If anything, it is strengthened and reinforced by it. Where the vista of distance between the human community and God is as steadily maintained as it is by negative theology, the prospect of our succumbing to idolatry and worshipping our own handiwork is considerably diminished. My argument is formulated as a kind of thought experiment. Working with the Maimonidean assumptions in Sefer Ha-Madaʿ and The Guide of the Perplexed (including the annexation of God as a necessary First Cause in the genealogy of monotheism and the historical assumption that the patriarch Abraham was the discoverer of the monotheistic principle), what relationship emerges between monotheism and scepticism? The implicit conception of the relationship between religion and scepticism derivable from negative theology is a function of the central place that Platonic and Neoplatonic arguments occupy in its arsenal. Throughout this paper, I am using the term “scepticism” to refer to the philosophical doctrine that states that words are underdetermined by things; that no item in the “furniture” of the world or the human psyche can be framed in only one way, but that openness and flexibility always prevail with regard to designating the identity of things.
犹太宗教中一神教和怀疑主义的同时起源
在本文中,我将论证宗教和怀疑主义之间的概念二分法不能充分捕捉圣经一神教在世界上开创了什么。在一些关键方面,我将试图分析的情节,我将旨在表明,犹太人的怀疑主义和它的世俗主义的文化关联是共同广泛的犹太一神论。我将试图勾勒出一个论点的大致轮廓,这个论点将支持西方一神论和西方怀疑主义都源于消极神学的说法。我将试图说明的是,阻碍否定神学和怀疑主义教义完全连贯陈述的逻辑障碍,指向了这两种教义的共同起源和共同命运。西方宗教的传统叙事及其与西方怀疑主义的关系需要彻底修正。传统的故事是围绕着宗教和怀疑思维模式之间不可调和的冲突这一观点而构建的,并被引用来支持这一观点。宗教和怀疑主义之间的冲突被认为既适用于实质性教义,也适用于宗教和怀疑话语的论证方法。以消极神学(我们只能说上帝不是什么,但不能说他是什么)作为我们的组织视角,我们可以认为,宗教和怀疑主义之间的连续性和重叠领域比紧张和不连续性领域更加突出和决定性。宗教的实践绝不会受到这种认识的威胁或破坏。如果有什么区别的话,那就是它被强化和强化了。当人类社会和上帝之间的距离被消极的神学所稳定地维持时,我们屈服于偶像崇拜和崇拜我们自己的作品的前景就大大减少了。我的论证是一种思想实验。结合迈蒙尼德在《赛弗·哈·玛达·伊》和《迷惘指南》中的假设(包括在一神教谱系中将上帝作为必然的第一因的合并,以及族长亚伯拉罕是一神教原则的发现者的历史假设),一神教和怀疑主义之间出现了什么关系?从否定神学中衍生出来的关于宗教和怀疑主义之间关系的隐含概念,是柏拉图主义和新柏拉图主义论点在其武器库中占据中心地位的一个功能。在本文中,我一直使用“怀疑主义”一词来指代这样一种哲学学说,即语言不受事物的决定;在世界或人类心灵的“家具”中,没有任何一件东西只能用一种方式来构建,但在指定事物的身份时,开放性和灵活性总是占上风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信