Distribution of biogeochemical compounds in interstitial and surface standing water bodies in the gravel bar of the Kizu River, Japan

K. Anbutsu, T. Nakajima, Y. Takemon, K. Tanida, N. Goto, O. Mitamura
{"title":"Distribution of biogeochemical compounds in interstitial and surface standing water bodies in the gravel bar of the Kizu River, Japan","authors":"K. Anbutsu, T. Nakajima, Y. Takemon, K. Tanida, N. Goto, O. Mitamura","doi":"10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0166-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributions of biogeochemical constituents in interstitial water and isolated standing water bodies (or pools) were investigated in gravel bars 1 km in length to assess the ability of these waters to serve as a sink or source for nutrients. The temperature and concentration of major ions in interstitial water differed very little from those of river water. DO concentrations in interstitial waters were 5.7 ± 2.2 mg O 2 /l and 3.5 ± 1.8 mg O 2 /l at the side and dried-up channels, respectively. Concentrations of ammonium and nitrite of both interstitial waters at the side (0.50 ± 0.17μM and 0.13 ± 0.09μM, NH 4 + and NO;\"\") and dried-up channels (0.90 ± 2.14μM and 0.27 ± 0.37μM) were lower than those of river water (1.7 ± 0.8 μM and 0.73 ± 0.22 μM), whereas nitrate (85 ± 25 μM at the side channel and 79 ± 36 μM at the dried-up channel) did not differ on average from those of river water (70 ± 12 μM), though they were often very low (< 10 % of those of river water) at shallow depths of the vegetated areas in the dried-up channel. Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations in interstitial waters at the dried-up channel (0.84 ± 0.53 μM) were lower than those at the side channel (1.9 ± 0.5 μM) and those of river water (1.5 ± 0.5 μM), and decreased downstream. These results suggest that this aerobic hyporheic zone can serve as a sink for ammonium, nitrite and SRP and to a lesser extent of nitrate. Concentrations of these nutrients in pool water varied greatly but did not differ on average from those of river water. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and SRP concentrations were negatively related to the algal biomass. Pool waters also had lower DIN concentrations at the vegetated areas and higher SPR concentrations at the bar head. These results suggest that nutrient concentrations in pool waters are controlled in a complex manner by algal assimilation and surface-subsurface water exchange. Therefore some pools may serve as a sink and others as a source for nutrients.","PeriodicalId":8118,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0166-0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Distributions of biogeochemical constituents in interstitial water and isolated standing water bodies (or pools) were investigated in gravel bars 1 km in length to assess the ability of these waters to serve as a sink or source for nutrients. The temperature and concentration of major ions in interstitial water differed very little from those of river water. DO concentrations in interstitial waters were 5.7 ± 2.2 mg O 2 /l and 3.5 ± 1.8 mg O 2 /l at the side and dried-up channels, respectively. Concentrations of ammonium and nitrite of both interstitial waters at the side (0.50 ± 0.17μM and 0.13 ± 0.09μM, NH 4 + and NO;"") and dried-up channels (0.90 ± 2.14μM and 0.27 ± 0.37μM) were lower than those of river water (1.7 ± 0.8 μM and 0.73 ± 0.22 μM), whereas nitrate (85 ± 25 μM at the side channel and 79 ± 36 μM at the dried-up channel) did not differ on average from those of river water (70 ± 12 μM), though they were often very low (< 10 % of those of river water) at shallow depths of the vegetated areas in the dried-up channel. Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations in interstitial waters at the dried-up channel (0.84 ± 0.53 μM) were lower than those at the side channel (1.9 ± 0.5 μM) and those of river water (1.5 ± 0.5 μM), and decreased downstream. These results suggest that this aerobic hyporheic zone can serve as a sink for ammonium, nitrite and SRP and to a lesser extent of nitrate. Concentrations of these nutrients in pool water varied greatly but did not differ on average from those of river water. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and SRP concentrations were negatively related to the algal biomass. Pool waters also had lower DIN concentrations at the vegetated areas and higher SPR concentrations at the bar head. These results suggest that nutrient concentrations in pool waters are controlled in a complex manner by algal assimilation and surface-subsurface water exchange. Therefore some pools may serve as a sink and others as a source for nutrients.
日本Kizu河沙洲间隙水体和地表静水体生物地球化学化合物的分布
在长度为1 km的砾石坝中,研究了间隙水和孤立的静水体(或水池)中生物地球化学成分的分布,以评估这些水体作为营养物质的汇或源的能力。间隙水中主要离子的温度和浓度与河水差别不大。侧边和干流间质水体DO浓度分别为5.7±2.2 mg o2 /l和3.5±1.8 mg o2 /l。氨和亚硝酸盐的浓度同时间隙水侧(0.50±0.17μM和0.13±0.09μM, NH 4 +没有;" ")和干涸的渠道(0.90±2.14μM和0.27±0.37μM)是低于河水(1.7±0.8μM和0.73±0.22μM),而硝酸25μM(85±79±36侧槽和μM在干涸的频道)没有与河水的平均差异(70±12μM),但在干枯河道植被覆盖区域的浅层,它们往往很低(低于河水的10%)。干枯河道间隙水可溶性活性磷(SRP)浓度(0.84±0.53 μM)低于侧河道间隙水(1.9±0.5 μM)和河道间隙水(1.5±0.5 μM),下游呈下降趋势。这些结果表明,这个好氧低氧区可以作为铵、亚硝酸盐和SRP的汇,以及较小程度的硝酸盐。池水中这些营养物质的浓度变化很大,但与河水的平均浓度没有差异。溶解无机氮(DIN)和SRP浓度与藻类生物量呈负相关。池水植被区DIN浓度较低,坝头SPR浓度较高。这些结果表明,池水中的营养物质浓度受藻类同化和地表水-地下水交换的复杂控制。因此,一些池可以作为汇,而另一些池可以作为营养物的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信