Numerical investigation of the interactions between a low-hypersonic shock wave and a water droplet: VOF and DI methods comparison

G. Tymen, D. Hébert, J. Rullier, T. Bridel-Bertomeu, I. Bertron, S. Peluchon, E. Lescoute, F. Virot
{"title":"Numerical investigation of the interactions between a low-hypersonic shock wave and a water droplet: VOF and DI methods comparison","authors":"G. Tymen, D. Hébert, J. Rullier, T. Bridel-Bertomeu, I. Bertron, S. Peluchon, E. Lescoute, F. Virot","doi":"10.2495/cmem-v8-n4-341-354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present the hydrodynamic mechanisms which occur between a low-hypersonic shock wave and a millimetric water droplet. To do so, two numerical models, based respectively on the Volume of Fluid (VOF) and Diffuse Interfaces (DI) approaches, are developed. The goal is to compare the results obtained with the models in order to evaluate which is the most accurate to describe the evolution of the physical phenomena. The studied Mach number and initial droplet diameter are 4.25 and 1.135 mm, respectively. Each model allows the compressible Euler equations to be solved in a 2D-axisymmetric configuration. The evolution of both air and liquid phases is modelled by a stiffened gas equation of state. For qualitative validation, the numerical results are compared to experimental data recently presented in the literature. In this work, the authors used a shock tube test facility and a shadowgraph visualization technique to observe the phenomenology over a long time. Their investigation shows that the droplet deformation, detached bow shock and recompression waves are well captured by the two models until a Rayleigh dimensionless time of 1.5. Beyond this critical time, and up to 3, some differences appear between the two numerical approaches, especially on the droplet deformation. Globally, the droplet deformation is better described with the VOF model, while the DI model appears to be more accurate when it comes to the evaluation of the position of the bow shock. In the discussion section, some ideas are proposed to improve the models.","PeriodicalId":22520,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS","volume":"64 1","pages":"341-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v8-n4-341-354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we present the hydrodynamic mechanisms which occur between a low-hypersonic shock wave and a millimetric water droplet. To do so, two numerical models, based respectively on the Volume of Fluid (VOF) and Diffuse Interfaces (DI) approaches, are developed. The goal is to compare the results obtained with the models in order to evaluate which is the most accurate to describe the evolution of the physical phenomena. The studied Mach number and initial droplet diameter are 4.25 and 1.135 mm, respectively. Each model allows the compressible Euler equations to be solved in a 2D-axisymmetric configuration. The evolution of both air and liquid phases is modelled by a stiffened gas equation of state. For qualitative validation, the numerical results are compared to experimental data recently presented in the literature. In this work, the authors used a shock tube test facility and a shadowgraph visualization technique to observe the phenomenology over a long time. Their investigation shows that the droplet deformation, detached bow shock and recompression waves are well captured by the two models until a Rayleigh dimensionless time of 1.5. Beyond this critical time, and up to 3, some differences appear between the two numerical approaches, especially on the droplet deformation. Globally, the droplet deformation is better described with the VOF model, while the DI model appears to be more accurate when it comes to the evaluation of the position of the bow shock. In the discussion section, some ideas are proposed to improve the models.
低高超声速激波与水滴相互作用的数值研究:VOF和DI方法的比较
本文研究了低高超声速激波与毫米级水滴之间的流体动力学机制。为此,分别基于流体体积(VOF)和扩散界面(DI)方法建立了两个数值模型。目的是将得到的结果与模型进行比较,以评估哪一个最准确地描述了物理现象的演变。所研究的马赫数和初始液滴直径分别为4.25和1.135 mm。每个模型都允许在二维轴对称配置中求解可压缩欧拉方程。气相和液相的演化都是用强化气体状态方程来模拟的。为了进行定性验证,将数值结果与最近文献中提出的实验数据进行了比较。在这项工作中,作者使用激波管试验设备和阴影可视化技术长时间观察现象学。他们的研究表明,在瑞利无量纲时间为1.5之前,两种模型都能很好地捕捉液滴变形、分离弓形激波和再压缩波。超过这个临界时间,直到3,两种数值方法之间出现一些差异,特别是在液滴变形上。总体而言,VOF模型能更好地描述液滴变形,而DI模型在评估船首激波位置时更为准确。在讨论部分,提出了一些改进模型的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信