Comparison Study between the UAE, the UK, and India in Dealing with WhatsApp Fake News

Q2 Social Sciences
Dr. Robin Kabha, Dr. Ahmad Kamel, Dr. Moataz Elbahi, Dr. Sumit Narula
{"title":"Comparison Study between the UAE, the UK, and India in Dealing with\nWhatsApp Fake News","authors":"Dr. Robin Kabha, Dr. Ahmad Kamel, Dr. Moataz Elbahi, Dr. Sumit Narula","doi":"10.31620/jccc.12.19/18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary comparative understanding of the effectiveness of legal and other controlling measures against fake news on social media forums like WhatsApp is very limited and growing legal development in relation to cyber-crime in the Middle East region warrants a comparative inquiry into this matter. The aim of this research paper is to conduct a comparative study of the UAE, UK and India in dealing with WhatsApp fake news. This study used a qualitative research approach and secondary data review research methods to inquire. This study has found that laws in the UAE with managing fake news over mediums like WhatsApp are more effective than India and the UK, due the presence of clearer, comprehensive and explicit jurisprudence approach in the UAE. Unlike India, UAE‟s laws do not put all the burden of the regulator on a service provider and unlike India and the UK, anti-fake news laws in the UAE, do not spare social media users from their responsibilities and obligations. Financial penalty, imprisonment, social media monitoring mechanism has helped the UAE to have a more effective and stringent legal framework against the fake news where government, social media forums, users and the entire society collectively play their part to counter fake news spreading in the surrounding environment.","PeriodicalId":37311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Content, Community and Communication","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Content, Community and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31620/jccc.12.19/18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The contemporary comparative understanding of the effectiveness of legal and other controlling measures against fake news on social media forums like WhatsApp is very limited and growing legal development in relation to cyber-crime in the Middle East region warrants a comparative inquiry into this matter. The aim of this research paper is to conduct a comparative study of the UAE, UK and India in dealing with WhatsApp fake news. This study used a qualitative research approach and secondary data review research methods to inquire. This study has found that laws in the UAE with managing fake news over mediums like WhatsApp are more effective than India and the UK, due the presence of clearer, comprehensive and explicit jurisprudence approach in the UAE. Unlike India, UAE‟s laws do not put all the burden of the regulator on a service provider and unlike India and the UK, anti-fake news laws in the UAE, do not spare social media users from their responsibilities and obligations. Financial penalty, imprisonment, social media monitoring mechanism has helped the UAE to have a more effective and stringent legal framework against the fake news where government, social media forums, users and the entire society collectively play their part to counter fake news spreading in the surrounding environment.
阿联酋、英国和印度在处理whatsapp假新闻方面的比较研究
目前对法律和其他控制措施对WhatsApp等社交媒体论坛上假新闻的有效性的比较了解非常有限,中东地区与网络犯罪相关的法律发展越来越多,值得对此事进行比较调查。本研究论文的目的是对阿联酋、英国和印度在处理WhatsApp假新闻方面进行比较研究。本研究采用质性研究方法和二手资料回顾研究方法进行问卷调查。这项研究发现,由于阿联酋存在更清晰、全面和明确的法律方法,阿联酋在管理WhatsApp等媒体上的假新闻方面的法律比印度和英国更有效。与印度不同的是,阿联酋的法律并没有将监管机构的所有负担都放在服务提供商身上,与印度和英国不同的是,阿联酋的反假新闻法并没有免除社交媒体用户的责任和义务。经济处罚、监禁、社交媒体监测机制帮助阿联酋建立了一个更有效和严格的法律框架来打击假新闻,政府、社交媒体论坛、用户和整个社会共同发挥作用,打击假新闻在周围环境中的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Content, Community and Communication
Journal of Content, Community and Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Amity School of Communication, AUMP, Gwalior is publishing a bi-annual referred and peer-reviewed journal named “Journal of Content, Community & Communication”. The Journal of Content, Community & Communication aims at delving into inquiry into and providing a forum for discussion pertaining to contemporary communication issues within wider social, economic, cultural and technological contexts. The journal promotes analyzing contemporary communication issues in new light and research. It will aim at bringing to the surface, innovative ways of research to initiate a dialogue on an array of subject matters in the field of communication theory and practice. The journal will engage in a wide range of themes in the media studies, digital media, and communication management among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信