Comparison of Extraction Methods of Chitin and Chitosan from Different Sources

Alef Ibram, A. Ionescu, Emin Cadâr
{"title":"Comparison of Extraction Methods of Chitin and Chitosan from Different Sources","authors":"Alef Ibram, A. Ionescu, Emin Cadâr","doi":"10.26417/688wvv48e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chitin and chitosan have become of great interest not only as underutilized resources, but also as new functional materials of high potential in various fields. The methods of isolating chitosan from different sources: shrimp (Panaeus monodon), crab (Scylla olivicea and Scylla serrata), locust (Schistocerca gregaria), honeybee (Apis mellifera), beelte (Calosoma rugosa) and fish (Labeo rohita) were compared. The same steps of demineralization and deproteinization were followed for the chemical extraction of chitin, but the concentration of reagents, the temperatures and reaction times were varied, which resulted in chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation.","PeriodicalId":11935,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences","volume":"116 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/688wvv48e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Chitin and chitosan have become of great interest not only as underutilized resources, but also as new functional materials of high potential in various fields. The methods of isolating chitosan from different sources: shrimp (Panaeus monodon), crab (Scylla olivicea and Scylla serrata), locust (Schistocerca gregaria), honeybee (Apis mellifera), beelte (Calosoma rugosa) and fish (Labeo rohita) were compared. The same steps of demineralization and deproteinization were followed for the chemical extraction of chitin, but the concentration of reagents, the temperatures and reaction times were varied, which resulted in chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation.
不同来源甲壳素和壳聚糖提取方法的比较
几丁质和壳聚糖不仅是一种未被充分利用的资源,而且是一种具有广泛应用前景的新型功能材料。比较了不同来源虾(Panaeus monodon)、蟹(Scylla olivicea和Scylla serrata)、蝗虫(Schistocerca gregaria)、蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)、甲虫(Calosoma rugosa)和鱼(Labeo rohita)中壳聚糖的分离方法。化学提取几丁质的脱矿和脱蛋白步骤相同,但试剂浓度、温度和反应时间不同,导致壳聚糖脱乙酰程度不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信