Active Citizenship and Neighborhood Governance; North-Western Literature and Global South Realities

Aya Elwageeh, M. Ham, R. Kleinhans
{"title":"Active Citizenship and Neighborhood Governance; North-Western Literature and Global South Realities","authors":"Aya Elwageeh, M. Ham, R. Kleinhans","doi":"10.13189/sa.2020.080202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active citizenship related to neighborhood governance is dependent on the political and governance structures of its context, and is therefore different in the Global North and the Global South. Local active citizenship is often presented from a North-western perspective, with its own active culture of engagement. In contrast, it is often shaped by an unfamiliar culture of engagement in parts of the Global South. This difference questions the applicability of the leading literature in understanding Global South realities. The paper aims to answer this question by reviewing the literature on local activism in both contexts. This review elaborates on the commonality of \"context\"; while highlighting the variation of \"right-based vs. need-based\" and \"state-citizen collaboration vs. selective state-citizen collaboration\" as central dimensions of local activism in both worlds. In result, we conclude that the leading literature on active citizenship in the context of neighborhood governance is limited in its explanation of local activism found in parts of the Global South. Finally, this review paper contributes to inform future empirical research on how to better understand neighborhood activism in contexts of the Global South. In this regard, the deduced commonalities and variations offer a starting point to scholars and offer dimensions which could be investigated to improve our understanding of active resident groups, and eventually contribute to more effective local activism.","PeriodicalId":21798,"journal":{"name":"Sociology and anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2020.080202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Active citizenship related to neighborhood governance is dependent on the political and governance structures of its context, and is therefore different in the Global North and the Global South. Local active citizenship is often presented from a North-western perspective, with its own active culture of engagement. In contrast, it is often shaped by an unfamiliar culture of engagement in parts of the Global South. This difference questions the applicability of the leading literature in understanding Global South realities. The paper aims to answer this question by reviewing the literature on local activism in both contexts. This review elaborates on the commonality of "context"; while highlighting the variation of "right-based vs. need-based" and "state-citizen collaboration vs. selective state-citizen collaboration" as central dimensions of local activism in both worlds. In result, we conclude that the leading literature on active citizenship in the context of neighborhood governance is limited in its explanation of local activism found in parts of the Global South. Finally, this review paper contributes to inform future empirical research on how to better understand neighborhood activism in contexts of the Global South. In this regard, the deduced commonalities and variations offer a starting point to scholars and offer dimensions which could be investigated to improve our understanding of active resident groups, and eventually contribute to more effective local activism.
积极公民意识与邻里治理西北文学与全球南方现实
与社区治理相关的积极公民身份取决于其背景的政治和治理结构,因此在全球北方和全球南方有所不同。当地积极的公民身份经常从西北的角度呈现,具有自己积极的参与文化。相比之下,它往往是由南半球部分地区不熟悉的参与文化塑造的。这种差异质疑了主流文献在理解全球南方现实方面的适用性。本文旨在通过回顾这两个背景下的地方行动主义文献来回答这个问题。本文阐述了“语境”的共性;同时强调了“以权利为基础vs.以需求为基础”和“国家-公民合作vs.选择性国家-公民合作”作为两个世界地方行动主义的核心维度的变化。因此,我们得出结论,关于社区治理背景下积极公民身份的主要文献在解释全球南方部分地区的地方行动主义方面是有限的。最后,本文对如何更好地理解全球南方背景下的社区行动主义的实证研究提供了信息。在这方面,推断出的共性和差异为学者提供了一个起点,并提供了可以研究的维度,以提高我们对活跃居民群体的理解,并最终有助于更有效的地方行动主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信