Comparison of in-vial exhaust method versus conventional exhaust method in the injection of COVID-19 vaccine

Q4 Nursing
Jingjin Xu, Hui Zhi, Ye Li, Jinjing Liu, Wen Zheng, Ling Tang
{"title":"Comparison of in-vial exhaust method versus conventional exhaust method in the injection of COVID-19 vaccine","authors":"Jingjin Xu, Hui Zhi, Ye Li, Jinjing Liu, Wen Zheng, Ling Tang","doi":"10.4103/jin.jin_28_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the application effects of in-vial exhaust method and conventional exhaust method in the process of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine injection. Materials and Methods: Using convenient sampling method, 102 vaccines were selected as experiment group during the process of vaccine injection, and the in-vial exhaust method was used. One hundred and five vaccines were selected as the control group and the conventional exhaust method was adopted. The incidence of vaccine solution spillage and exhausting time in the two groups during exhaust were observed. Results: The incidence of solution spillage in the experiment group was lower than that in the control group (0 vs. 6.67%, P < 0.05). The exhausting time of the experiment group was shorter than that of the control group ([15.12 ± 4.43] s vs. [22.74 ± 6.53] s, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementing the in-vial exhaust method in the vaccine injection can effectively reduce the incidence of solution spillage, reduce nucleic acid contamination, and ensure that the vaccine is injected at the prescribed dose. Moreover, the operation is simple and easy, which improves the nurse's vaccination efficiency, and has a higher promotion and application value.","PeriodicalId":34651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","volume":"116 2 1","pages":"106 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jin.jin_28_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the application effects of in-vial exhaust method and conventional exhaust method in the process of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine injection. Materials and Methods: Using convenient sampling method, 102 vaccines were selected as experiment group during the process of vaccine injection, and the in-vial exhaust method was used. One hundred and five vaccines were selected as the control group and the conventional exhaust method was adopted. The incidence of vaccine solution spillage and exhausting time in the two groups during exhaust were observed. Results: The incidence of solution spillage in the experiment group was lower than that in the control group (0 vs. 6.67%, P < 0.05). The exhausting time of the experiment group was shorter than that of the control group ([15.12 ± 4.43] s vs. [22.74 ± 6.53] s, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementing the in-vial exhaust method in the vaccine injection can effectively reduce the incidence of solution spillage, reduce nucleic acid contamination, and ensure that the vaccine is injected at the prescribed dose. Moreover, the operation is simple and easy, which improves the nurse's vaccination efficiency, and has a higher promotion and application value.
瓶内排气法与常规排气法注射COVID-19疫苗的比较
目的:比较瓶内排气法与常规排气法在2019冠状病毒病疫苗注射过程中的应用效果。材料与方法:采用方便取样法,在疫苗注射过程中选取102支疫苗作为实验组,采用瓶内排气法。选取105支疫苗作为对照组,采用常规排气法。观察两组在排气过程中疫苗液溢出的发生率和排气时间。结果:实验组溶液溢出发生率低于对照组(0比6.67%,P < 0.05)。实验组排气时间明显短于对照组([15.12±4.43]s∶[22.74±6.53]s, P < 0.05)。结论:在疫苗注射中实施瓶内排气法,可有效减少溶液溢出的发生,减少核酸污染,保证疫苗按规定剂量注射。而且操作简单易行,提高了护士的接种效率,具有较高的推广应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Nursing
Journal of Integrative Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信