Tairui Zhang, Jianxun Li, Xun Sun, Xiandong Shang, Weiqiang Wang
{"title":"Improving the tensile property calculations with plastic zone radius measurements in depth-sensing spherical indentation tests","authors":"Tairui Zhang, Jianxun Li, Xun Sun, Xiandong Shang, Weiqiang Wang","doi":"10.1177/03093247211043982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depth-sensing spherical indentation tests (SITs) have been widely used in tensile property calculations, but the accuracy and reproducibility of calculations may be significantly influenced by displacement measurement errors. Taking two representative tensile property calculation methods as examples, namely the analytical and numerical methods, the rationale as to why accurate and reproducible tensile property calculations cannot be expected from the depth-sensing SITs was discussed in detail. Subsequently, the proportional limit σ0 calculation from plastic zone radius rp measurements, which was analytically developed in the expanding cavity model (ECM) and experimentally measured by digital image correlation (DIC), was introduced to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the two representative methods. Principles for setting the strain threshold εth were established, and factors influencing the σ0 calculation from rp measurements were investigated through the optical system, the friction condition, the hardening behaviors of specimen materials, and the indentation depth. Through finite element calculations, it was proven that tensile property calculations at the existence of displacement measurement errors, particularly the constant error from the origin correction, can be significantly improved with the introduction of rp measurements. Similar findings were also observed in experiments on four metals that exhibited different hardening behaviors.","PeriodicalId":50038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247211043982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Depth-sensing spherical indentation tests (SITs) have been widely used in tensile property calculations, but the accuracy and reproducibility of calculations may be significantly influenced by displacement measurement errors. Taking two representative tensile property calculation methods as examples, namely the analytical and numerical methods, the rationale as to why accurate and reproducible tensile property calculations cannot be expected from the depth-sensing SITs was discussed in detail. Subsequently, the proportional limit σ0 calculation from plastic zone radius rp measurements, which was analytically developed in the expanding cavity model (ECM) and experimentally measured by digital image correlation (DIC), was introduced to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the two representative methods. Principles for setting the strain threshold εth were established, and factors influencing the σ0 calculation from rp measurements were investigated through the optical system, the friction condition, the hardening behaviors of specimen materials, and the indentation depth. Through finite element calculations, it was proven that tensile property calculations at the existence of displacement measurement errors, particularly the constant error from the origin correction, can be significantly improved with the introduction of rp measurements. Similar findings were also observed in experiments on four metals that exhibited different hardening behaviors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design provides a forum for work relating to the measurement and analysis of strain that is appropriate to engineering design and practice.
"Since launching in 1965, The Journal of Strain Analysis has been a collegiate effort, dedicated to providing exemplary service to our authors. We welcome contributions related to analytical, experimental, and numerical techniques for the analysis and/or measurement of stress and/or strain, or studies of relevant material properties and failure modes. Our international Editorial Board contains experts in all of these fields and is keen to encourage papers on novel techniques and innovative applications." Professor Eann Patterson - University of Liverpool, UK
This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).