Trade-off between breast mean glandular dose and image quality in digital and conventional mammogram systems: A multicenter study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Rezapour, A. Mostear, A. Tarighatnia, F. Falahati, S. M. Hosseini, G. Johal, N. Nader, L. Dastranj, R. Abedi-Firouzjah
{"title":"Trade-off between breast mean glandular dose and image quality in digital and conventional mammogram systems: A multicenter study","authors":"J. Rezapour, A. Mostear, A. Tarighatnia, F. Falahati, S. M. Hosseini, G. Johal, N. Nader, L. Dastranj, R. Abedi-Firouzjah","doi":"10.1051/RADIOPRO/2021017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating the patient dose or exposure parameters considering the image quality can improve the chances of accurate diagnosis and reduce the unnecessary exposures from medical devices such as mammography. This study aimed to evaluate digital and conventional mammography machines while considering the trade-off between image quality and mean glandular dose (MGD) using a phantom. In the present study, one full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and two film-screen mammography (FSM) machines were investigated. The MGD values and image quality were assessed using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom at various mAs and constant kVp values. The results were obtained and compared with European guidelines. Friedman and Wilcoxon statistical tests were used to show the comparison. The results from the quality control (QC) tests demonstrated that all machines are functioning well. The best image quality in the digital mammography machine was observed at the MGD of 1.8 mGy and 55 mAs. In addition, the two conventional machines had the best image quality regarding the imaging of the ACR phantom at 65 mAs with an MGD of 2.1 mGy. These values were considered as appropriate values for the studied mammography systems. Furthermore, the Friedman test demonstrated that there are significant differences between the measured image quality values obtained from the different machines (p < 0.05), however, according to the Wilcoxon test there were not any significant differences between the conventional machines at various mAs values. Owing to the results, for a medium breast size, the image quality will not be improved with increasing the exposure after a specified MGD corresponds to a certain mAs. It is notable that this value is smaller in digital mammography system at a reasonably low dose.","PeriodicalId":21009,"journal":{"name":"Radioprotection","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioprotection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/RADIOPRO/2021017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Evaluating the patient dose or exposure parameters considering the image quality can improve the chances of accurate diagnosis and reduce the unnecessary exposures from medical devices such as mammography. This study aimed to evaluate digital and conventional mammography machines while considering the trade-off between image quality and mean glandular dose (MGD) using a phantom. In the present study, one full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and two film-screen mammography (FSM) machines were investigated. The MGD values and image quality were assessed using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom at various mAs and constant kVp values. The results were obtained and compared with European guidelines. Friedman and Wilcoxon statistical tests were used to show the comparison. The results from the quality control (QC) tests demonstrated that all machines are functioning well. The best image quality in the digital mammography machine was observed at the MGD of 1.8 mGy and 55 mAs. In addition, the two conventional machines had the best image quality regarding the imaging of the ACR phantom at 65 mAs with an MGD of 2.1 mGy. These values were considered as appropriate values for the studied mammography systems. Furthermore, the Friedman test demonstrated that there are significant differences between the measured image quality values obtained from the different machines (p < 0.05), however, according to the Wilcoxon test there were not any significant differences between the conventional machines at various mAs values. Owing to the results, for a medium breast size, the image quality will not be improved with increasing the exposure after a specified MGD corresponds to a certain mAs. It is notable that this value is smaller in digital mammography system at a reasonably low dose.
数字和传统乳房x光检查系统中乳腺平均腺剂量和图像质量之间的权衡:一项多中心研究
考虑图像质量评估患者剂量或暴露参数可以提高准确诊断的机会,并减少乳房x光检查等医疗设备的不必要暴露。本研究旨在评估数字和传统乳房x线照相机,同时考虑图像质量和使用假体的平均腺体剂量(MGD)之间的权衡。在本研究中,研究了一台全视场数字乳房x线照相术(FFDM)和两台膜屏乳房x线照相术(FSM)。在不同的mAs和恒定的kVp值下,使用美国放射学会(ACR)幻像评估MGD值和图像质量。研究结果与欧洲指南进行了比较。使用Friedman和Wilcoxon统计检验来显示比较。质量控制(QC)测试的结果表明,所有的机器都运行良好。在1.8 mGy和55 ma的MGD下,数字乳房x线照相机的图像质量最好。此外,两种传统机器在65 mAs下成像ACR幻体的成像质量最好,MGD为2.1 mGy。这些值被认为是所研究的乳腺x线摄影系统的适当值。此外,Friedman检验表明,在不同机器上获得的测量图像质量值之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),而根据Wilcoxon检验,在不同mAs值下,传统机器之间没有显著差异。由此可见,对于中等乳房尺寸,在给定的MGD对应一定的mAs后,随着曝光量的增加,图像质量不会得到改善。值得注意的是,在合理低剂量的数字乳房x线摄影系统中,该值较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radioprotection
Radioprotection ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
54.50%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radioprotection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes (theoretical and practical aspects): dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信