5PSQ-191 New general drug chart, post-implementation clinical audit

D. Murphy, K. Holacka, J. Brown
{"title":"5PSQ-191 New general drug chart, post-implementation clinical audit","authors":"D. Murphy, K. Holacka, J. Brown","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance A new general drug chart was introduced in May 2019. The chart was developed in response to medication incidents and in line with national medication record templates. The new drug chart has a new configuration and format for prescribing. Changes include dedicated sections for anticoagulants and antimicrobials and a venous thromboembolism and bleeding risk assessment (VTE-RA) tool, which was previously available on the hospital intranet. Aim and objectives To assess the implementation of this change in prescribing practice. Material and methods A data collection form was designed using the hospital’s ‘prescribing and drug administration standards’. This document describes how prescribers and nursing staff are to use the drug chart. Guidelines include where to prescribe specific medication, use of abbreviations and general best practice guidelines. Data were collected by nurse and pharmacist volunteers in September 2019. A target sample size of approximately 275 patients was chosen as this equates to half of the inpatients. A convenience sample was collected. Data collectors were assigned to collect data on specific wards until the target sample number was reached. Anonymised data were analysed by pharmacy staff using Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results 273 drug charts were reviewed. An average of 16 medicines were prescribed per patient (range 1–41). 75% (n=204) of patients were prescribed an anticoagulant, however, only 3% (n=8) of patients had the VTE–RA tool completed by the medical team. The majority of anticoagulant (99.5%) and antimicrobial (95%) prescriptions were written in the correct section. The surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) section was used in 42% (n=11) of applicable cases. For patients prescribed an antimicrobial requiring therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the correct section was always used. Completion of target and attained levels was documented for 38% and 35% of patients on TDM antimicrobials, respectively. Documentation of ‘proposed duration’ and ‘clinical indication’ for antimicrobials was 25% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion and relevance The new general drug chart is being used in line with hospital standards in most instances. Topics that could be targeted for improvement include the use of the SAP section, documentation of target/attained levels of TDM antimicrobials and specifying ‘proposed duration’ and ‘clinical indication’ for antimicrobials. Research on the appropriate completion of the VTE-RA tool is currently underway. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance A new general drug chart was introduced in May 2019. The chart was developed in response to medication incidents and in line with national medication record templates. The new drug chart has a new configuration and format for prescribing. Changes include dedicated sections for anticoagulants and antimicrobials and a venous thromboembolism and bleeding risk assessment (VTE-RA) tool, which was previously available on the hospital intranet. Aim and objectives To assess the implementation of this change in prescribing practice. Material and methods A data collection form was designed using the hospital’s ‘prescribing and drug administration standards’. This document describes how prescribers and nursing staff are to use the drug chart. Guidelines include where to prescribe specific medication, use of abbreviations and general best practice guidelines. Data were collected by nurse and pharmacist volunteers in September 2019. A target sample size of approximately 275 patients was chosen as this equates to half of the inpatients. A convenience sample was collected. Data collectors were assigned to collect data on specific wards until the target sample number was reached. Anonymised data were analysed by pharmacy staff using Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results 273 drug charts were reviewed. An average of 16 medicines were prescribed per patient (range 1–41). 75% (n=204) of patients were prescribed an anticoagulant, however, only 3% (n=8) of patients had the VTE–RA tool completed by the medical team. The majority of anticoagulant (99.5%) and antimicrobial (95%) prescriptions were written in the correct section. The surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) section was used in 42% (n=11) of applicable cases. For patients prescribed an antimicrobial requiring therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the correct section was always used. Completion of target and attained levels was documented for 38% and 35% of patients on TDM antimicrobials, respectively. Documentation of ‘proposed duration’ and ‘clinical indication’ for antimicrobials was 25% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion and relevance The new general drug chart is being used in line with hospital standards in most instances. Topics that could be targeted for improvement include the use of the SAP section, documentation of target/attained levels of TDM antimicrobials and specifying ‘proposed duration’ and ‘clinical indication’ for antimicrobials. Research on the appropriate completion of the VTE-RA tool is currently underway. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
5PSQ-191新药品总图,实施后临床审核
背景和重要性2019年5月出台了新的一般药物图表。该图表是根据用药事件制定的,并与国家用药记录模板保持一致。新的药物图表具有新的配置和处方格式。变化包括抗凝血剂和抗菌剂的专用部分,以及静脉血栓栓塞和出血风险评估(VTE-RA)工具,该工具以前可在医院内网获得。目的和目标评估这一改变在处方实践中的实施情况。材料与方法采用医院《处方药品管理规范》设计数据收集表。本文件描述了开处方者和护理人员如何使用药物图表。指南包括在哪里开特定药物,使用缩写和一般最佳实践指南。数据由护士和药剂师志愿者于2019年9月收集。目标样本量约为275名患者,这相当于住院患者的一半。收集了方便样本。数据收集人员被指派收集特定病房的数据,直到达到目标样本数量。药房工作人员使用Microsoft Excel对匿名数据进行分析。进行描述性统计。结果查阅了273份药物图表。每位患者平均处方16种药物(范围1-41)。75% (n=204)的患者使用了抗凝剂,但只有3% (n=8)的患者使用了由医疗团队完成的VTE-RA工具。抗凝剂(99.5%)和抗菌药物(95%)处方填写正确。42% (n=11)的适用病例采用外科抗菌预防(SAP)部分。对于需要治疗性药物监测(TDM)的患者,始终使用正确的切片。使用TDM抗微生物药物的患者中,分别有38%和35%达到了目标水平。关于抗菌素“建议持续时间”和“临床适应症”的记录分别为25%和50%。结论与意义新的综合用药图在大多数情况下是符合医院标准的。可以针对改进的主题包括SAP部分的使用,TDM抗菌剂的目标/达到水平的文件,以及指定抗菌剂的“建议持续时间”和“临床适应症”。目前正在对VTE-RA工具的适当完成进行研究。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信