Antimicrobial preservation efficacy of liquid glucose and liquid maltitol syrups with and without 0.1% sorbic acid

Thomas Carpentier, Eve Maillard, Mathilde Royer, Lina Mustapha, F. Marçon
{"title":"Antimicrobial preservation efficacy of liquid glucose and liquid maltitol syrups with and without 0.1% sorbic acid","authors":"Thomas Carpentier, Eve Maillard, Mathilde Royer, Lina Mustapha, F. Marçon","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Amongst paediatric pharmaceutical forms, syrups offer advantages such as ease of administration and good palatability. They also exhibited microbial self-preservation properties that may be useful to enhance shelf life of liquid formulation. The objective of our works is to test the self-preservation efficacy of maltitol and glucose syrup without or with sorbic acid as described in the European pharmacopoeia. Methods The European Pharmacopoeia test of antimicrobial preservation efficacy was performed on liquid glucose syrup and liquid maltitol syrup with and without 0.1% sorbic acid. Results Unpreserved glucose and maltitol syrups did not meet the European Pharmacopoeia acceptance criteria for antimicrobial preservative efficacy due to the regrowth of Aspergillus brasiliensis on day 28 whereas glucose and maltitol syrups with 0.1% sorbic acid pass the test. Conclusions The addition of a preservative (sorbic acid) in glucose and maltitol syrups allows the validation of the antimicrobial preservative efficacy test of the European Pharmacopoeia. Further tests are needed to see if preservative efficacy is maintained despite dilutions or in the presence of active pharmaceutical ingredients.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Amongst paediatric pharmaceutical forms, syrups offer advantages such as ease of administration and good palatability. They also exhibited microbial self-preservation properties that may be useful to enhance shelf life of liquid formulation. The objective of our works is to test the self-preservation efficacy of maltitol and glucose syrup without or with sorbic acid as described in the European pharmacopoeia. Methods The European Pharmacopoeia test of antimicrobial preservation efficacy was performed on liquid glucose syrup and liquid maltitol syrup with and without 0.1% sorbic acid. Results Unpreserved glucose and maltitol syrups did not meet the European Pharmacopoeia acceptance criteria for antimicrobial preservative efficacy due to the regrowth of Aspergillus brasiliensis on day 28 whereas glucose and maltitol syrups with 0.1% sorbic acid pass the test. Conclusions The addition of a preservative (sorbic acid) in glucose and maltitol syrups allows the validation of the antimicrobial preservative efficacy test of the European Pharmacopoeia. Further tests are needed to see if preservative efficacy is maintained despite dilutions or in the presence of active pharmaceutical ingredients.
添加和不添加0.1%山梨酸的液体葡萄糖和液体麦芽糖醇糖浆的抗菌保鲜效果
摘要目的在儿科药物形式中,糖浆具有易于管理和适口性好的优点。它们还表现出微生物的自我保存特性,这可能有助于提高液体制剂的保质期。我们的工作目的是测试麦芽糖醇和葡萄糖浆的自我保存功效,不含山梨酸或加入欧洲药典中描述的山梨酸。方法采用欧洲药典对添加0.1%山梨酸和不添加0.1%山梨酸的液体葡萄糖浆和麦芽糖醇液体糖浆进行抗菌保鲜效果试验。结果未保存的葡萄糖和麦芽糖醇糖浆由于巴西曲霉在第28天再生而不符合欧洲药典的抗菌保鲜验收标准,而添加0.1%山梨酸的葡萄糖和麦芽糖醇糖浆通过了试验。结论在葡萄糖和麦芽糖醇糖浆中添加防腐剂山梨酸可通过欧洲药典的抗菌防腐效果试验验证。需要进一步的试验,以确定在稀释或存在活性药物成分的情况下,防腐剂的功效是否保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信