The Islamic Human Rights Deficit: Region, Not Religion, Is the Driver

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
W. Cole
{"title":"The Islamic Human Rights Deficit: Region, Not Religion, Is the Driver","authors":"W. Cole","doi":"10.1080/18918131.2023.2212997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scholarly research, journalistic accounts, and popular discourses often portray Islam as detrimental to human rights. Governments in Muslim-majority countries are considered especially prone to violating bodily integrity protections, curtailing civil and political liberties, repressing women and LGBT people, and restricting religious freedoms. Using cross-national time-series data for a majority of the world’s countries, this article demonstrates that Islam per se is not responsible for human rights deficits in any of these domains. Simply being a Muslim-majority country is not associated with increased rights violations. Rather, human rights gaps are confined to Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East and North Africa region and, in some cases, to Arab countries. Additional research to explain these patterns is warranted.","PeriodicalId":42311,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","volume":"8 1","pages":"189 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2212997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scholarly research, journalistic accounts, and popular discourses often portray Islam as detrimental to human rights. Governments in Muslim-majority countries are considered especially prone to violating bodily integrity protections, curtailing civil and political liberties, repressing women and LGBT people, and restricting religious freedoms. Using cross-national time-series data for a majority of the world’s countries, this article demonstrates that Islam per se is not responsible for human rights deficits in any of these domains. Simply being a Muslim-majority country is not associated with increased rights violations. Rather, human rights gaps are confined to Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East and North Africa region and, in some cases, to Arab countries. Additional research to explain these patterns is warranted.
伊斯兰人权赤字:地区而非宗教是罪魁祸首
学术研究、新闻报道和大众话语经常将伊斯兰教描绘成对人权有害的。穆斯林占多数的国家的政府被认为特别容易违反对身体完整的保护,限制公民和政治自由,压制妇女和同性恋者,限制宗教自由。本文使用世界上大多数国家的跨国时间序列数据,证明伊斯兰教本身不应对这些领域的人权缺陷负责。仅仅作为一个穆斯林占多数的国家,并不意味着人权侵犯的增加。相反,人权差距仅限于中东和北非地区穆斯林占多数的国家,在某些情况下也仅限于阿拉伯国家。有必要进行更多的研究来解释这些模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Human Rights
Nordic Journal of Human Rights POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Nordic Journal of Human Rights is the Nordic countries’ leading forum for analyses, debate and information about human rights. The Journal’s aim is to provide a cutting-edge forum for international academic critique and analysis in the field of human rights. The Journal takes a broad view of human rights, and wishes to publish high quality and cross-disciplinary analyses and comments on the past, current and future status of human rights for profound collective reflection. It was first issued in 1982 and is published by the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights at the University of Oslo in collaboration with Nordic research centres for human rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信