An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system

Mark Gebhart, Bertrand A. Maher, Katherine E. Coons, Jeff Diamond, Paul V. Gratz, M. Marino, N. Ranganathan, Behnam Robatmili, Aaron Smith, J. Burrill, S. Keckler, D. Burger, K. McKinley
{"title":"An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system","authors":"Mark Gebhart, Bertrand A. Maher, Katherine E. Coons, Jeff Diamond, Paul V. Gratz, M. Marino, N. Ranganathan, Behnam Robatmili, Aaron Smith, J. Burrill, S. Keckler, D. Burger, K. McKinley","doi":"10.1145/1508244.1508246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The TRIPS system employs a new instruction set architecture (ISA) called Explicit Data Graph Execution (EDGE) that renegotiates the boundary between hardware and software to expose and exploit concurrency. EDGE ISAs use a block-atomic execution model in which blocks are composed of dataflow instructions. The goal of the TRIPS design is to mine concurrency for high performance while tolerating emerging technology scaling challenges, such as increasing wire delays and power consumption. This paper evaluates how well TRIPS meets this goal through a detailed ISA and performance analysis. We compare performance, using cycles counts, to commercial processors. On SPEC CPU2000, the Intel Core 2 outperforms compiled TRIPS code in most cases, although TRIPS matches a Pentium 4. On simple benchmarks, compiled TRIPS code outperforms the Core 2 by 10% and hand-optimized TRIPS code outperforms it by factor of 3. Compared to conventional ISAs, the block-atomic model provides a larger instruction window, increases concurrency at a cost of more instructions executed, and replaces register and memory accesses with more efficient direct instruction-to-instruction communication. Our analysis suggests ISA, microarchitecture, and compiler enhancements for addressing weaknesses in TRIPS and indicates that EDGE architectures have the potential to exploit greater concurrency in future technologies.","PeriodicalId":89892,"journal":{"name":"ASPLOS ... proceedings. International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems","volume":"73 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASPLOS ... proceedings. International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1508244.1508246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

The TRIPS system employs a new instruction set architecture (ISA) called Explicit Data Graph Execution (EDGE) that renegotiates the boundary between hardware and software to expose and exploit concurrency. EDGE ISAs use a block-atomic execution model in which blocks are composed of dataflow instructions. The goal of the TRIPS design is to mine concurrency for high performance while tolerating emerging technology scaling challenges, such as increasing wire delays and power consumption. This paper evaluates how well TRIPS meets this goal through a detailed ISA and performance analysis. We compare performance, using cycles counts, to commercial processors. On SPEC CPU2000, the Intel Core 2 outperforms compiled TRIPS code in most cases, although TRIPS matches a Pentium 4. On simple benchmarks, compiled TRIPS code outperforms the Core 2 by 10% and hand-optimized TRIPS code outperforms it by factor of 3. Compared to conventional ISAs, the block-atomic model provides a larger instruction window, increases concurrency at a cost of more instructions executed, and replaces register and memory accesses with more efficient direct instruction-to-instruction communication. Our analysis suggests ISA, microarchitecture, and compiler enhancements for addressing weaknesses in TRIPS and indicates that EDGE architectures have the potential to exploit greater concurrency in future technologies.
对TRIPS计算机系统的评价
TRIPS系统采用了一种新的指令集架构(ISA),称为显式数据图执行(EDGE),它重新协商了硬件和软件之间的边界,以暴露和利用并发性。EDGE isa使用块原子执行模型,其中块由数据流指令组成。TRIPS设计的目标是挖掘并发性以获得高性能,同时容忍新兴技术扩展挑战,例如增加的线路延迟和功耗。本文通过详细的ISA和绩效分析来评估TRIPS实现这一目标的程度。我们使用周期计数将性能与商用处理器进行比较。在SPEC CPU2000上,英特尔酷睿2在大多数情况下优于编译后的TRIPS代码,尽管TRIPS与奔腾4相匹配。在简单的基准测试中,编译的TRIPS代码比Core 2高出10%,手工优化的TRIPS代码比Core 2高出3倍。与传统isa相比,块原子模型提供了更大的指令窗口,以执行更多指令为代价提高了并发性,并用更有效的直接指令对指令通信取代了寄存器和内存访问。我们的分析表明,ISA、微架构和编译器的增强可以解决TRIPS中的弱点,并表明EDGE架构有潜力在未来的技术中利用更大的并发性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书