Praktik Baik Kelompok Penerima Manfaat (KPM) Bantuan Program PKH Setelah Exit Program Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan

Lasarus Jehamat, Yosef Emanuel Jelahut, C. E. Meka
{"title":"Praktik Baik Kelompok Penerima Manfaat (KPM) Bantuan Program PKH Setelah Exit Program Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan","authors":"Lasarus Jehamat, Yosef Emanuel Jelahut, C. E. Meka","doi":"10.33007/SKA.V10I2.2360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was entitled Good Practices for the Implementation of the Harapan Family Program (Case Study in Oesena Village and Nonbes Village, Amarasi District, Kupang Regency). This study is based on data on the amount of PKH funds that were not used properly in several regions, including NTT. However, the Beneficiary Groups (KPM) in Oesena and Nonbes Villages demonstrated good practice of PKH funds. This study aims to see and identify the efforts developed by the KPM PKH Program post-exit PKH Program and the business strategies of post-exit PKH fund recipients in improving welfare. This study uses qualitative techniques with 12 research subjects. Sampling is done by purposes sampling. Data collection was carried out by means of observation, FGD, and in-depth interviews. The results showed that the PKH funding program in Oesena and Nonbes villages was very good in developing PKH funds. Funds received by KPM are used to meet the needs of schools and pregnant women (30%), savings (20) and to develop household businesses (50%). KPM members have an innovative, creative, and productive spirit in PKH assistance funds. PKH Beneficiary Groups (KPM) in Oesena Village and Nonbes Village have a strategy to improve welfare, namely by making individual budget plans, starting small businesses, marketing products from capital and PKH.","PeriodicalId":32713,"journal":{"name":"Sosio Konsepsia Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosio Konsepsia Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33007/SKA.V10I2.2360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study was entitled Good Practices for the Implementation of the Harapan Family Program (Case Study in Oesena Village and Nonbes Village, Amarasi District, Kupang Regency). This study is based on data on the amount of PKH funds that were not used properly in several regions, including NTT. However, the Beneficiary Groups (KPM) in Oesena and Nonbes Villages demonstrated good practice of PKH funds. This study aims to see and identify the efforts developed by the KPM PKH Program post-exit PKH Program and the business strategies of post-exit PKH fund recipients in improving welfare. This study uses qualitative techniques with 12 research subjects. Sampling is done by purposes sampling. Data collection was carried out by means of observation, FGD, and in-depth interviews. The results showed that the PKH funding program in Oesena and Nonbes villages was very good in developing PKH funds. Funds received by KPM are used to meet the needs of schools and pregnant women (30%), savings (20) and to develop household businesses (50%). KPM members have an innovative, creative, and productive spirit in PKH assistance funds. PKH Beneficiary Groups (KPM) in Oesena Village and Nonbes Village have a strategy to improve welfare, namely by making individual budget plans, starting small businesses, marketing products from capital and PKH.
受益小组的良好实践(KPM)帮助eccl项目后,以促进福利
这项研究的题目是《实施哈拉潘家庭计划的良好做法》(以库邦县阿马拉西县Oesena村和Nonbes村为例)。这项研究是根据包括NTT在内的几个地区没有适当使用PKH资金数额的数据进行的。然而,Oesena和Nonbes村的受益团体(KPM)展示了PKH基金的良好做法。本研究旨在了解和确认KPM PKH计划在退出PKH计划后所作出的努力,以及退出PKH基金接受者在改善福利方面的商业策略。本研究采用定性研究方法,共有12个研究对象。抽样的目的是抽样。数据收集采用观察法、FGD法和深度访谈法。结果表明,Oesena村和Nonbes村的PKH资助项目在发展PKH资金方面做得很好。KPM收到的资金用于满足学校和孕妇的需求(30%)、储蓄(20%)和发展家庭企业(50%)。pkm成员在PKH援助资金方面具有创新、创造和生产精神。Oesena村和Nonbes村的PKH受益群体(KPM)有一个改善福利的战略,即制定个人预算计划、开办小企业、利用资本和PKH营销产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信