Thoughts on a new health care paradigm.

T. Davidson
{"title":"Thoughts on a new health care paradigm.","authors":"T. Davidson","doi":"10.1136/EWJM.175.6.429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The insurance industry has removed the joy from health care delivery with authorizations, documentation, guidelines for evaluation and treatment, diminished reimbursement, reimbursement delays, and denied payments. Physicians are now paid for what they write on the chart, not for what they do for the patient. Failure to document may mean fines or criminal charges. The legal system has rendered the medical record an abomination by requiring every piece of paper to be saved. We, as physicians, have lost control of our profession. \n \nPatients are demanding quality health care. Health care practitioners need stability. If we allow the situation to go on, our government is sure to increase industry regulations. This may mean legislation expanding the scope of practice for allied health care providers, thereby circumventing physicians and undermining our control. If we do not want to become regulated government employees, we should initiate a major overhaul of health care delivery. \n \nPhysicians must band together to recommend an improved health care paradigm. Medicine is a unique profession. Supply, demand, and competition run counterproductive to cost-effective quality health care. Individuals, groups, and medical organizations must stop lobbying for their own special interests, and present a single voice.","PeriodicalId":22925,"journal":{"name":"The Western journal of medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"429-30; discussion 430-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EWJM.175.6.429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The insurance industry has removed the joy from health care delivery with authorizations, documentation, guidelines for evaluation and treatment, diminished reimbursement, reimbursement delays, and denied payments. Physicians are now paid for what they write on the chart, not for what they do for the patient. Failure to document may mean fines or criminal charges. The legal system has rendered the medical record an abomination by requiring every piece of paper to be saved. We, as physicians, have lost control of our profession. Patients are demanding quality health care. Health care practitioners need stability. If we allow the situation to go on, our government is sure to increase industry regulations. This may mean legislation expanding the scope of practice for allied health care providers, thereby circumventing physicians and undermining our control. If we do not want to become regulated government employees, we should initiate a major overhaul of health care delivery. Physicians must band together to recommend an improved health care paradigm. Medicine is a unique profession. Supply, demand, and competition run counterproductive to cost-effective quality health care. Individuals, groups, and medical organizations must stop lobbying for their own special interests, and present a single voice.
关于新的卫生保健范式的思考。
保险行业通过授权、文件、评估和治疗指南、减少报销、延迟报销和拒绝付款,剥夺了医疗保健服务的乐趣。现在,医生的报酬是根据他们在病历上写的内容,而不是根据他们为病人做了什么。未能提供文件可能意味着罚款或刑事指控。法律制度要求每张纸都要保存,这使得医疗记录令人憎恶。作为医生,我们已经失去了对自己职业的掌控。病人要求高质量的医疗保健。卫生保健从业人员需要稳定。如果我们让这种情况继续下去,我们的政府肯定会增加行业监管。这可能意味着立法扩大联合医疗保健提供者的执业范围,从而绕过医生并破坏我们的控制。如果我们不想成为受管制的政府雇员,我们就应该对医疗服务进行重大改革。医生必须联合起来推荐一种改进的卫生保健模式。医学是一种独特的职业。供应、需求和竞争不利于具有成本效益的高质量卫生保健。个人、团体和医疗机构必须停止为自己的特殊利益进行游说,并发出统一的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信