“We will look like fools if nothing comes of this Yugoslavia!”: The Establishment of Yugoslavia from the Perspective of Slovene Contemporaries

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Rok Stergar
{"title":"“We will look like fools if nothing comes of this Yugoslavia!”: The Establishment of Yugoslavia from the Perspective of Slovene Contemporaries","authors":"Rok Stergar","doi":"10.5325/hiperboreea.10.1.0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Throughout east, central, and southeast Europe, postwar national historiographies largely represented the breakup of Austria-Hungary and the establishment of successor states as a foregone conclusion, as a process that could only end with the foundation of nation-states, and a significant part of Slovene historiography still clings to such an interpretation. The author attempts to revise this nationalist meta-narrative about the transition from Austria-Hungary to Yugoslavia. Describing the uncertain atmosphere and bringing the open-endedness of developments to the fore, the author contends that very little seemed predetermined in 1918; that other outcomes appeared possible; and that the establishment of the State of Slovenes, Croats, and Serbs as well as its subsequent unification with Serbia was not a product of a prolonged and systematic effort, supported by a mass movement. More than anything, it was a reaction to the changed circumstances of late 1918, and the proclamation of independence caught many by surprise.","PeriodicalId":40175,"journal":{"name":"Hiperboreea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiperboreea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/hiperboreea.10.1.0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout east, central, and southeast Europe, postwar national historiographies largely represented the breakup of Austria-Hungary and the establishment of successor states as a foregone conclusion, as a process that could only end with the foundation of nation-states, and a significant part of Slovene historiography still clings to such an interpretation. The author attempts to revise this nationalist meta-narrative about the transition from Austria-Hungary to Yugoslavia. Describing the uncertain atmosphere and bringing the open-endedness of developments to the fore, the author contends that very little seemed predetermined in 1918; that other outcomes appeared possible; and that the establishment of the State of Slovenes, Croats, and Serbs as well as its subsequent unification with Serbia was not a product of a prolonged and systematic effort, supported by a mass movement. More than anything, it was a reaction to the changed circumstances of late 1918, and the proclamation of independence caught many by surprise.
“如果南斯拉夫什么都不做,我们就会像傻瓜一样!”:从斯洛文尼亚同时代人的视角看南斯拉夫的建立
在整个东欧、中欧和东南欧,战后的民族史学在很大程度上把奥匈帝国的解体和继承国的建立作为一个必然的结果,作为一个只有在民族国家建立时才能结束的过程,斯洛文尼亚史学的很大一部分仍然坚持这样的解释。作者试图修正这种关于奥匈帝国向南斯拉夫过渡的民族主义元叙事。作者描述了不确定的气氛,并将发展的开放性突出,他认为1918年似乎没有什么是预先确定的;其他结果似乎是可能的;斯洛文尼亚人、克罗地亚人和塞尔维亚人国家的建立以及随后与塞尔维亚的统一并不是由群众运动支持的长期和系统努力的产物。最重要的是,这是对1918年末环境变化的一种反应,宣布独立令许多人感到意外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hiperboreea
Hiperboreea HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信