Laser Powder Bed Fusion-built Ti6Al4V Bone Scaffolds Composed of Sheet and Strut-based Porous Structures: Morphology, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility

Shuai Ma , Qian Tang , Changbao Zhu , Fuyou Wang , Qixiang Feng , Jun Song , Rossitza Setchi , Chenglong Ma , Ran Tao
{"title":"Laser Powder Bed Fusion-built Ti6Al4V Bone Scaffolds Composed of Sheet and Strut-based Porous Structures: Morphology, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility","authors":"Shuai Ma ,&nbsp;Qian Tang ,&nbsp;Changbao Zhu ,&nbsp;Fuyou Wang ,&nbsp;Qixiang Feng ,&nbsp;Jun Song ,&nbsp;Rossitza Setchi ,&nbsp;Chenglong Ma ,&nbsp;Ran Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and <em>in vivo</em> bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The <em>in vivo</em> experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100243,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356/pdfft?md5=df8ab3c87f0982dec7f55432d47400bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772665722000356-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772665722000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)-built triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are designed by implicit functions and are endowed with superior characteristics, such as adjustable mechanical properties and light-weight features for bone repairing; thus, they are considered as potential candidates for bone scaffolds. Unfortunately, previous studies have mainly focused on different TPMS structures. The fundamental understanding of the differences between strut and sheet-based structures remains exclusive, where both were designed by one formula. This consequently hinders their practical applications. Herein, we compared the morphology, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of sheet and strut-based structures. In particular, the different properties and in vivo bone repair effects of the two structures are uncovered. First, the morphology characteristics demonstrate that the manufacturing errors of sheet-based structures with diverse porosities are comparable, and semi-melting powders as well as the ball phenomenon are observed; in comparison, strut-based samples exhibit cracks and thickness shrinking. Second, the mechanical properties indicate that the sheet-based structures have a greater elastic modulus, energy absorption, and better repeatability compared to strut-based structures. Furthermore, layer-by-layer fracturing and diagonal shear failure modes are observed in strut-based and sheet-based structures, respectively. The in vivo experiment demonstrates enhanced bone tissues in the strut-based scaffold. This study significantly enriches our understanding of TPMS structures and provides significant insights in the design of bone scaffolds under various bone damaging conditions.

激光粉末床融合构建Ti6Al4V骨支架,由薄片和支柱组成的多孔结构:形态学,力学性能和生物相容性
激光粉末床融合(L-PBF)构建的三周期最小表面(TPMS)结构采用隐式函数设计,具有力学性能可调、轻量化等优点,适合骨修复;因此,它们被认为是骨支架的潜在候选材料。不幸的是,以往的研究主要集中在不同的TPMS结构上。对支撑结构和基于板的结构之间差异的基本理解仍然是排他的,两者都是由一个公式设计的。因此,这阻碍了它们的实际应用。在此,我们比较了薄片和支架结构的形态、力学性能和生物相容性。特别是,揭示了两种结构的不同性质和体内骨修复效果。首先,形貌特征表明,不同孔隙率的片基结构的制造误差具有可比性,并且观察到半熔融粉末和球现象;相比之下,基于支柱的样品表现出裂纹和厚度缩小。力学性能表明,板材结构比支柱结构具有更大的弹性模量、能量吸收和更好的可重复性。此外,在柱基和板基结构中分别观察到逐层破裂和斜剪破坏模式。体内实验表明支架增强了骨组织。本研究极大地丰富了我们对TPMS结构的认识,为各种骨损伤条件下骨支架的设计提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信